首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent’s Distance and Visual Salience
【24h】

Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent’s Distance and Visual Salience

机译:解读爱沙尼亚人的演示:参考距离和视觉显着的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Most of the research done with spatial demonstratives (words such as this , here and that , there ) have focused on the production, not the interpretation, of these words. In addition, emphasis has been largely on demonstrative pronouns, leaving demonstrative adverbs with relatively little research attention. The present study explores the interpretation of both demonstrative pronouns and demonstrative adverbs in Estonian—a Finno-Ugric language with two dialectal-specific demonstrative pronoun systems. In the South-Estonian (SE) dialectal region, two demonstrative pronouns, see —“this” and too— “that”, are used. In the North-Estonian (NE) region, only one, see —“this/that”, is used. The aim of this study is twofold. First, we test if the distance and the visual salience of a referent have an effect on the interpretation of demonstratives. Second, we explore if there is a difference in the interpretation of demonstratives between native speakers from SE and NE. We used an interpretation experiment with 30 participants per group (total n = 60) and compared the SE and NE group responses. The results clearly show that the distance of the referent has an effect on how demonstratives are interpreted across the two groups, while the effect of visual salience is inconclusive. There is also a difference in the interpretation of demonstratives between the two dialectal groups. When using the Estonian with an influence of the SE dialect, the NE speakers rely on demonstrative adverbs in interpreting the referential utterance that includes demonstrative pronoun and adverb combinations, whereas the SE speakers also take into account the semantics of demonstrative pronouns. We show that, in addition to an already known difference in the production, there is also a difference in the interpretation of demonstratives between the two groups. In addition, our findings support the recognition that languages that have distance neutral demonstrative pronouns enforce the spatial meaning of a referring utterance by adding demonstrative adverbs. Not only is the interpretation of demonstrative pronouns affected, but the interpretation of demonstrative adverbs as well. The latter shows the importance of studying adverbs also, not just pronouns, and contributes to further knowledge of how demonstratives function.
机译:大多数研究用空间证明(如此,这里,这里,那里)专注于生产,而不是解释这些词。此外,重点在很大程度上都是在示范代词上,留下了具有相对较少的研究关注的示范副词。本研究探讨了具有两个方言专用的演示代词系统的爱沙尼亚人 - 一种芬内诺语言的演示代词和演示副词的解释。在南爱沙尼亚(SE)方解石地区,使用两个示范代词,见 - “这”和太“这”。在北爱沙尼亚(NE)地区,只使用一个,看 - “这个/这”。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,我们测试如果参考的距离和视力视力有关证明的解释。其次,我们探索如果母语在SE和NE之间的母语人员之间的演示差异存在差异。我们使用每组30名参与者的解释实验(总N = 60),并比较SE和NE组反应。结果清楚地表明,参考文献的距离对演示者在两组上解释的效果,而视力变性的效果是不确定的。两种方言组之间的证明的解释也有所不同。当使用爱沙尼亚人的影响时,NE扬声器依赖于演示副词来解释包括证明代词和副词组合的参考话语,而SE扬声器还考虑了示范代词的语义。我们表明,除了已知的生产差异外,两组方向性的解释也存在差异。此外,我们的调查结果支持识别与距离中性的演示代词的语言通过添加演示副词来强制执行参考话语的空间含义。不仅对影响的证明代词的解释,而且是对示范副词的解释。后者表现出研究副词的重要性,而不仅仅是代词,并有助于进一步了解证明者如何运作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号