...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words
【24h】

Derivational Morphology in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Comparison Between Prefixed and Suffixed Words

机译:Agrammatic aphasia中的衍生形态:前缀和后缀词之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

Although a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms of specific properties of prefixes and suffixes.
机译:虽然对所获得的语言障碍的相对大量的研究已经测试了衍生形态的情况,但这些都没有特别研究了是否存在损害前缀和后缀的衍生词的差异。基于前缀和后缀衍生词的语言和精神语言考虑,预测了如何处理这两种类型的推导的差异,从而受到损害。在目前的研究中,我们调查了用Agrammatic aphasia(NN,LG,SA)的三个德国人大声朗读简单,前缀和后缀的单词所产生的错误。我们发现,当NN和LG产生类似的错误时出现了类似的前缀和后缀单词,SA显示了前缀单词的选择性损伤。此外,NN和SA产生了更多的误差,具体涉及附件的附加词,而不是与后缀的单词。我们以前缀和后缀的单词的茎和粘贴的相对位置讨论我们的研究结果,以及前缀和后缀的特定性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号