...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Accuracy and Efficiency of Fusion Robotics? Versus Mazor-X? in Single-Level Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement
【24h】

Accuracy and Efficiency of Fusion Robotics? Versus Mazor-X? in Single-Level Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

机译:融合机器人的准确性和效率吗? 与mazor-x? 单层腰椎螺钉放置

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction There has been a surge in robot utilization in spine surgery over the past five years with the rapid development of new spine robotic platforms. This study aimed to compare a new robotic spine platform from Fusion Robotics TM? (Fusion Robotics, Helena, MT) with the widely used Mazor-X TM Stealth Edition robotic platform?(Medtronic,?Dublin, Ireland)?in terms of workflow and lumbar pedicle screw placement accuracy. Methods A cadaver lab was conducted, which included four procedures with single-level lumbar pedicle screw placement using the Fusion Robotics TM system. These four procedures were compared to four?propensity-score matched cases with single-level lumbar pedicle screw placement using the Mazor-X TM Stealth Edition.?A single surgeon performed all surgeries. The cases were matched in terms of demographics (age, sex, race, BMI) and comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index score). The primary outcome measure was the operative workflow efficiency (duration as measured with a stopwatch by an independent observer). The secondary outcome measures were pedicle screw accuracy and accuracy to plan. Results After propensity-score matching, there were four cases in each group with no significant between-group differences in terms of sex, race, BMI, or surgical levels; however, there were significant differences in terms of age (p=0.01) and comorbidities (p0.001). The workflow efficiency measurement showed that the Fusion Robotics TM platform had a significantly shorter duration in terms of the system set-up time, planning to in-position time, and total procedure time (p0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the robotic platforms in terms of creating a sterile barrier, scanning and importing images, creating a?plan, screw placement, screw accuracy, and screw accuracy to plan. Conclusion Based on our findings, the Fusion Robotics TM ?platform had a significantly shorter procedure workflow duration while maintaining the same accuracy as the most commonly used robotic platform (Mazor-X TM ). This is the first study to directly compare different spine surgery robotic systems.
机译:介绍过去五年在新脊柱机器人平台的快速发展中,脊柱手术中的机器人利用率飙升。本研究旨在将新的机器人脊柱平台与融合机器人TM进行比较? (Fusion Robotics,Helena,MT)与广泛使用的Mazor-X TM隐形版机械展平台?(Medtronic,?Dublin,爱尔兰)?在工作流程和腰椎螺钉放置精度方面。方法进行了一个尸体实验室,其中包括使用融合机器人TM系统的单级腰椎螺钉放置四个程序。将这四个程序与四个?倾向评分匹配案例与单级腰椎螺钉放置使用Mazor-X TM隐身版。单身外科医生进行所有手术。这些病例在人口统计数据(年龄,性,种族,BMI)和合并症(Charlson合并症指数评分)方面匹配。主要结果措施是操作流程效率(持续时间通过独立观察者用秒表测量)。二次结果措施是椎弓根螺钉精度和准确性。结果在倾向分数匹配后,每组中有四种病例,在性别,种族,BMI或手术层面的组间差异没有显着差异;然而,在年龄(P = 0.01)和合并症(P <0.001)中存在显着差异。工作流程效率测量表明,融合机器人TM平台在系统设置时间方面具有显着较短的持续时间,规划到位置时间,总程序时间(P <0.05)。然而,机器人平台在创建无菌屏障,扫描和导入图像方面没有显着差异,从而创建一个?计划,螺钉放置,螺杆精度和螺杆精度来规划。结论基于我们的研究结果,融合机器人TM?平台具有明显较短的过程工作流程持续时间,同时保持与最常用的机器人平台(Mazor-X TM)相同的准确性。这是第一项直接比较不同脊柱手术机器人系统的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号