首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A systematic review of the effectiveness of non- health facility based care delivery of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa measured by viral suppression, mortality and retention on ART
【24h】

A systematic review of the effectiveness of non- health facility based care delivery of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa measured by viral suppression, mortality and retention on ART

机译:通过病毒抑制,死亡率和艺术留下亚撒哈拉以南非洲艾滋病毒抗逆转录病毒治疗抗逆转录病毒治疗抗逆转录病毒治疗的有效性的系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Alternative models for sustainable antiretroviral treatment (ART) delivery are necessary to meet the increasing demand to maintain population-wide ART for all people living with HIV (PLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa. We undertook a review of published literature comparing health facility-based care (HFBC) with non-health facility based care (nHFBC) models of ART delivery in terms of health outcomes; viral suppression, loss to follow-up, retention and mortality. We conducted a systematic search of Medline, Embase and Global Health databases from 2010 onwards. UNAIDS reports, WHO guidelines and abstracts from conferences were reviewed. All studies measuring at least one of the following outcomes, viral load suppression, loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) and mortality were included. Data were extracted, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Risk of bias assessment was done for all studies. Pooled estimates of the risk difference (for viral suppression) and hazard ratio (for mortality) were made using random-effects meta-analysis. Of 3082 non-duplicate records, 193 were eligible for full text screening of which 21 published papers met the criteria for inclusion. The pooled risk difference of viral load suppression amongst 4 RCTs showed no evidence of a difference in viral suppression (VS) between nHFBC and HFBC with an overall estimated risk difference of 1% [95% CI -1, 4%]. The pooled hazard ratio of mortality amongst 2 RCTs and 4 observational cohort studies showed no evidence of a difference in mortality between nHFBC and HFBC with an overall estimated hazard ratio of 1.01 [95% CI 0.88, 1.16]. Fifteen studies contained data on LTFU and 13 studies on retention. Although no formal quantitative analysis was performed on these outcomes due to the very different definitions between papers, it was observed that the outcomes appeared similar between HFBC and nHFBC. Review of current literature demonstrates comparable outcomes for nHFBC compared to HFBC ART delivery programmes in terms of viral suppression, retention and mortality. CRD42018088194 .
机译:可持续抗逆转录病毒治疗(艺术)交付的替代模型是满足日益增长的需求,以维持所有与艾滋病毒(PLHIV)的人口普及人群艺术,以便在撒哈拉以南非洲。我们对出版的文献进行了审查,将卫生设施的护理(HFBC)与非健康设施的护理(NHFBC)在健康成果方面进行艺术交付模型;病毒抑制,随访,保留和死亡率。我们从2010年开始对MEDLINE,EMBASE和全球健康数据库进行了系统搜索。艾滋病规划署报告是审查了会议的指导方针和摘要。包括测量以下至少一种结果,病毒载荷抑制,丧失跟进(LTFU)和死亡率的所有研究。提取数据,进行描述性分析。所有研究都完成了偏见评估的风险。使用随机效应META分析制备风险差异(用于病毒抑制)和危险比(用于死亡率)的汇总估计。在3082个非重复记录中,193年有资格获得全文筛查,其中21个已发布的论文符合包含的标准。 4个RCT之间的病毒载荷抑制的汇总风险差异显示,NHFBC和HFBC之间的病毒抑制(VS)差异的证据表明,总估计的风险差为1%[95%CI -1,4%]。 2个RCT和4个观察队列研究中的死亡率的汇集危害比没有证据表明NHFBC和HFBC之间的死亡率差异,整体估计的危险比为1.01 [95%CI 0.88,1.16]。十五项研究含有关于LTFU的数据和13项保留研究。尽管由于论文之间的定义非常不同,但在这些结果上没有进行正式的定量分析,但观察到氢溴酸和NHFBC之间的结果出现了类似的结果。目前文献的审查表明,与病毒抑制,保留和死亡率的氢铅艺术递送方案相比,NHFBC的可比结果表明了NHFBC。 CRD42018088194。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号