首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Individual and family preferences of job qualities matter: association between face needs, locked-in job status, and burnout among high-tech workers in Taiwan
【24h】

Individual and family preferences of job qualities matter: association between face needs, locked-in job status, and burnout among high-tech workers in Taiwan

机译:工作质量的个人和家庭偏好事项:台湾高科技工作者之间的面部需求,锁定工作状态和倦怠之间的关联

获取原文
       

摘要

Studies on the health impacts of being locked in a job are primarily conducted in Western countries, with the theory based on the value of individualism. But the socially-oriented concerns should be considered in workers’ locked-in status in Chinese society. So the current study aims at evaluating socially-oriented concerns on workers’ locked-in status in Taiwan. Anonymous surveys were conducted with 1102 workers at high-tech companies in Taiwan from October 2015 to January 2016 to assess their “face” needs-- a sociological concept linked to the dignity, prestige, and reputation that a person has in terms of their social relationships, locked-in status of the job, and burnout. In addition to being separated into three groups by lock-in score, participants were categorized by the conflict of preference of the job between themselves and their family. Chi-square, ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and regression tests were conducted. Among the 1102 participants, 18% had jobs that they did not prefer but their family preferred. Participants with higher face needs and higher locked-in status had a significantly higher risk of developing personal and work-related burnout. However, the analysis using “locked-in job conflict of preference between themselves and their family” showed a more coherent result. Participants with a job which “self does not prefer but family do” had twice the risk of having personal and work-related burnout (OR?=?2.03 and 2.34, respectively). Participants with a job which neither themselves nor their family prefer had four times the risk of having personal and work-related burnout (OR?=?4.10 and 4.17, respectively). The current study suggests an importance in considering a socially-oriented job preference in locked-in status evaluations within the Chinese culture. Workers’ whose locked-in status preference conflicted with their family’s preference showed a significantly negative impact on their health.
机译:关于在工作中被锁定的健康影响的研究主要是在西方国家进行的,该理论基于个人主义的价值。但是,在中国社会的工人锁定地位应考虑到社会上导向的担忧。因此,目前的研究旨在评估对台湾工人锁定地位的社会导向问题。 2015年10月至2016年1月,台湾高科技公司的1102家工人进行了匿名调查,以评估其“面对”需求 - 与一个人在社交方面有关的社会学概念,与人们在社交方面有关的社会学概念工作的关系,锁定状态和倦怠。除了通过锁定分数分为三个群体之外,参与者被自己及其家人之间的工作的偏好冲突分类。 Chi-Square,Anova,Pearson相关性和回归测试。在1102名参与者中,18%的人有工作,他们不喜欢,但他们的家庭首选。面孔需求和更高的锁定状态的参与者具有显着提高个人和工作相关倦怠的风险。然而,使用“锁定工作偏好的偏好偏好自身和他们的家庭”的分析显示出更加连贯的结果。与“自我不喜欢但家庭”的工作的参与者有两倍的个人和工作相关的倦怠的风险(或分别?=?2.03和2.34)。与工作既不是自己也不喜欢的工作有四倍拥有个人和工作相关的倦怠的风险(或分别?4.10和4.17)。目前的研究表明,在中国文化中考虑在锁相状态评估中考虑社会直向的工作偏好。工人锁定状态偏好与家人的偏好相冲突现出对健康的显着负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号