...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Medicine storage, wastage, and associated determinants among urban households: a systematic review and meta-analysis of household surveys
【24h】

Medicine storage, wastage, and associated determinants among urban households: a systematic review and meta-analysis of household surveys

机译:城市家庭中的药物储存,浪费和相关决定因素:对家庭调查的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Irrational household storage of medicines is a world-wide problem, which triggers medicine wastage as well as its associated harms. This study aimed to include all available evidences from literature to perform a focused examination of the prevalence and factors associated with medicine storage and wastage among urban households. This systematic review and meta-analysis mapped the existing literature on the burden, outcomes, and affective socio-economic factors of medicine storage among urban households. In addition, this study estimated pooled effect sizes for storage and wastage rates. Household surveys evaluating modality, size, costs, and affective factors of medicines storage at home were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Google scholar databases in 2019. Random effect meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to pool effect sizes for medicine storage and wastage prevalence among different geographical regions. From the 2604 initial records, 20 studies were selected for systematic review and 16 articles were selected for meta-analysis. An overall pooled-prevalence of medicine storage and real wastage rate was 77 and 15%, respectively. In this regard, some significant differences were observed between geographical regions. Southwest Asia region had the highest storage and wastage rates. The most common classes of medicines found in households belonged to the Infective agents for systemic (17.4%) and the Nervous system (16.4%). Moreover, income, education, age, the presence of chronic illness, female gender, and insurance coverage were found to be associated with higher home storage. The most commonly used method of disposal was throwing them in the garbage. Factors beyond medical needs were also found to be associated with medicine storage, which urges effective strategies in the supply and demand side of the medicine consumption chain. The first necessary step to mitigate home storage is establishing an adequate legislation and strict enforcement of regulations on dispensing, prescription, and marketing of medicines. Patient’s pressure on excessive prescription, irrational storage, and use of medicines deserve efficient community-centered programs, in order to increase awareness on these issues. So, hazardous consequences of inappropriate disposal should be mitigated by different take back programs, particularly in low and middle income countries.
机译:无理性的家用储存药物是一个全世界的问题,它触发了药物的浪费以及其相关的危害。本研究旨在包括文献中的所有可用证据,以便对城市家庭中的医学储存和浪费相关的患病率和因素进行重点检查。该系统审查和荟萃分析映射了现有的文学,了解城市家庭中医学储存的负担,结果和情感社会经济因素。此外,本研究估计了储存和浪费率的汇总效果尺寸。 2019年,在Pubmed,Embase,Ovid,Scopus,Proquest和Google Scholar数据库中搜索了家庭中药物储存的模态,大小,成本和情感因素的家庭调查。随机效应元分析和子组分析用于池效果药物储存的大小和不同地理区域中的浪费流行。从2604次初始记录中,选择了20项研究进行系统审查,选择16制品进行荟萃分析。药物储存的整体汇总和实际浪费率分别为77%和15%。在这方面,地理区域之间观察到了一些显着差异。西南亚洲地区的储存量最高。家庭中发现最常见的药物类别属于全身(17.4%)和神经系统(16.4%)的感染剂。此外,发现收入,教育,年龄,慢性疾病,女性性别和保险范围的存在与高等房储存有关。最常用的处理方法在垃圾中扔掉它们。还发现超出了医疗需求的因素与药物储存有关,这促请了药物消费链的供需策略。第一个减轻家庭储存的必要步骤正在建立充分的立法和严格执行药物的分配,处方和营销法规。患者对过度处方,非理性存储和使用药物的压力值得有效的居民为中心的计划,以提高对这些问题的认识。因此,应通过不同的回归计划,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家的危险后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号