首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Stepping Stones or Second Class Donors?: a qualitative analysis of gay, bisexual, and queer men’s perspectives on plasma donation policy in Canada
【24h】

Stepping Stones or Second Class Donors?: a qualitative analysis of gay, bisexual, and queer men’s perspectives on plasma donation policy in Canada

机译:踩着石头或第二级捐助者?:对同性恋,双性恋和Queer Men在加拿大的血浆捐赠政策的看法的定性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Men who have sex with men (MSM) are not eligible to donate blood or plasma in Canada if they have had sex with another man in the last 3 months. This time-based deferment has reduced since 2013; from an initial lifetime ban, to five-years, one-year, and now three-months. Our previous research revealed that gay, bisexual, queer, and other MSM (GBM) supported making blood donation policies gender-neutral and behaviour-based. In this analysis, we explored the willingness of Canadian GBM to donate plasma, even if they were not eligible to donate blood.METHODS:We conducted in-depth interviews with 39 HIV-negative GBM in Vancouver (n?=?15), Toronto (n?=?13), and Montreal (n?=?11), recruited from a large respondent-driven sampling study called Engage. Men received some basic information on plasma donation prior to answering questions. Transcripts were coded in NVivo following inductive thematic analysis.RESULTS:Many GBM expressed a general willingness to donate plasma if they became eligible; like with whole blood donation, GBM conveyed a strong desire to help others in need. However, this willingness was complicated by the fact that most participants had limited knowledge of plasma donation and were unsure of its medical importance. Participants' perspectives on a policy that enabled MSM to donate plasma varied, with some viewing this change as a "stepping stone" to a reformed blood donation policy and others regarding it as insufficient and constructing GBM as "second-class" donors. When discussing plasma, many men reflected on the legacy of blood donor policy-related discrimination. Our data reveal a significant plasma policy disjuncture-a gulf between the critical importance of plasma donation from the perspective of Canada's blood operators and patients and the feelings of many GBM who understood this form of donation as less important.CONCLUSIONS:Plasma donor policies must be considered in relation to MSM blood donation policies to understand how donor eligibility practices are made meaningful by GBM in the context of historical disenfranchisement. Successful establishment of a MSM plasma donor policy will require extensive education, explicit communication of how this new policy contributes to continued/stepwise reform of blood donor policies, and considerable reconciliation with diverse GBM communities.
机译:背景:与男人发生性关系的人(MSM)在过去3个月内与另一名男子发生性关系,没有资格捐赠加拿大的血液或血浆。自2013年以来,这次基于时间的延期减少了;从初始寿命禁令,到五年,一年,现在三个月。我们以前的研究表明,同性恋,双性恋,酷儿和其他MSM(GBM)支持制作献血政策性别中立和行为。在这种分析中,即使他们没有资格捐赠血液,我们探讨了加拿大GBM捐赠血浆的意愿。 (n?=?13),蒙特利尔(n?=?11),从一个名为AFGAGE的大型受访者驱动的抽样研究招募。在回答问题之前,人们收到有关血浆捐赠的一些基本信息。在归纳专题分析之后,在NVIVO中编码了转录物。结果:许多GBM表示符合条件的捐赠等离子体的一般意愿;像全献献血一样,GBM传达了强烈希望帮助有需要的人。然而,这一事实,这一事实是大多数参与者对血浆捐赠的了解有限,并不确定其医学意义。参与者对一个能够使MSM捐赠血浆各种各样的政策的政策的观点,一些观察这一变化作为改革献血政策的“踏脚石”和其他有关其作为“二等”捐助者的血液捐赠政策和其他人。在讨论等离子体时,许多人反映在献血政策相关歧视的遗产上。我们的数据揭示了一项重要的等离子体政策脱血 - 从加拿大血液运营商和患者的角度来看,血浆捐赠的关键重要性与许多GBM的感受以及众多GBM的感情,他们明白这种捐赠的形式不那么重要。结论:等离子体捐助政策必须是考虑到MSM献血政策,了解捐助资格实践在历史脱离裁定的背景下的捐助者的资格实践是有意义的。成功建立MSM等离子体捐助政策将需要广泛的教育,明确沟通这一新政策如何努力继续/逐步改革献血政策,以及与各种GBM社区的相当大的和解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号