...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Insulin-Na?ve People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Detemir or Glargine: A Cohort Study in the UK
【24h】

All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Insulin-Na?ve People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Detemir or Glargine: A Cohort Study in the UK

机译:胰岛素-NA've患有2型糖尿病患者的全因和心血管死亡率,用胰岛素检测或肺狼治疗:英国队列研究

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionUncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of micro- and macrovascular complications and mortality. The impact of basal insulins on the risks of mortality and cardiovascular mortality in people with T2D has not been thoroughly investigated in real-world settings. The aim of the present real-word study was to investigate differences in mortality among insulin-na?ve people with T2D who initiated insulin detemir (detemir) and insulin glargine (glargine).MethodsWe assessed all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in people with T2D, aged?≥?40?years and insulin-na?ve at treatment initiation. People were identified from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD national database (2004–2019). Database information included prescribed medications, demographic and clinical variables and mortality. Cause of death was obtained from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). For mortality, 24 clinically relevant confounders were considered and adjusted for using Cox regression analyses.ResultsThe total cohort included 12,847 people with T2D, including 3031 who commenced detemir and 9816 who commenced glargine. Median age was 66.8?years and median diabetes duration was 7.6?years. From the total cohort, 3231 deaths occurred during follow-up and 6897 people were eligible for linkage to the ONS for cardiovascular mortality data (528 cardiovascular deaths). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.86 (0.79; 0.95) for all-cause mortality and 0.83 (0.67; 1.03) for cardiovascular mortality, in favour of detemir versus glargine. These associations were more pronounced among people with obesity (body mass index?≥?30?kg/m 2 ), with HRs (95% CI) of 0.79 (0.69; 0.91) and 0.69 (0.50; 0.96) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively.ConclusionIn this real-world observational study, there was an association between all-cause mortality and basal insulin choice in insulin-na?ve people with T2D; the mortality risk was lower with detemir versus glargine after adjustment for potential confounders.
机译:引入型型2型糖尿病(T2D)与微血管和大血管并发症和死亡率的风险增加有关。基础胰岛素对T2D人民死亡率和心血管死亡率风险的影响尚未在现实​​世界环境中进行彻底调查。目前实际研究的目的是探讨胰岛素-NA'VE与T2D的死亡率的差异,他发起胰岛素DECIMIR(DECIMIR)和胰岛素狼(GLARGINE).Methodswe评估了T2D人民的全因和心血管死亡率,年龄?≥?40?岁和胰岛素-NA?在治疗开始时。人们是从英国临床实践研究Datalink Gold国家数据库(2004-2019)中的。数据库信息包括规定的药物,人口统计和临床变量和死亡率。死亡原因是从国家统计局(ONS)办公室获得。对于死亡率,考虑了24个临床相关混淆,并调整使用Cox回归analyses.Resultthe总队列包括12,847人的T2D,包括3031人开始Detemir和9816年开始的冰壶。中位年龄为66.8?年龄和中位数糖尿病持续时间为7.6?年。从总队列中,3231人死亡发生在后续行动期间,6897人有资格与心血管死亡率数据(528个心血管死亡)联系。调整后的危险比(HR)(95%置信区间[CI])为所有导致死亡率为0.86(0.79; 0.95),用于心血管死亡率为0.83(0.67; 1.03),有利于DEDIMIR与狼蛛。这些关联在肥胖症(体重指数Δ≥10Ωkg / m 2)中更加明显,HRS(95%CI)为0.79(0.69; 0.91)和0.69(0.50; 0.96),适用于所有原因和心血管死亡率分别进行了这种现实世界的观察研究,在胰岛素-NA的胰岛素 - Na患者中的所有原因死亡率和基础胰岛素选择之间存在关联;在调整潜在混淆后,死亡率风险降低了狼吞虎咽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号