...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy >A regional analysis of payer and provider views on cholesterol management: PCSK9 inhibitors as an illustrative alignment model
【24h】

A regional analysis of payer and provider views on cholesterol management: PCSK9 inhibitors as an illustrative alignment model

机译:对胆固醇管理的付款人和提供者视图的区域分析:PCSK9抑制剂作为说明性对齐模型

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Multiple barriers exist for appropriate use of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 enzyme inhibitors (PCSK9i) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolemia despite standard therapies. Among these barriers, high payer rejection rates and inadequate prior authorization (PA) documentation by providers hinder optimal use of PCSK9i. OBJECTIVES: To (a) identify and discuss provider and payer discordances on barriers to authorization and use of PCSK9i based on clinical and real-world evidence and (b) align understanding and application of clinical, cost, safety, and efficacy data of PCSK9i. METHODS: Local groups of 3 payers and 3 providers met in 6 separate locations across the United States through a collaborative project of AMCP and PRIME Education. Responses to selected pre- and postmeeting survey questions measured changes in attitudes and beliefs regarding treatment barriers, lipid thresholds for considering PCSK9i therapy, and tactics for improving PA processes. Statistical analysis of inter- and intragroup changes in attitudes were performed by Cox proportional hazards test and Fisher’s exact test for 70 mg/dL for patients with ASCVD (78%-83% and 44%-67%, respectively) or FH (22%-39% and 22%-33%). Payers were more agreeable to less stringent PA requirements for patients with FH (33%-72%, P = 0.019) and need for standardized PA requirements (50%-83%, P = 0.034); these considerations remained high (89%) among providers after the meeting. Most participants supported educational programs for patient treatment adherence (83%) and physician/staff PA processes (83%-94%). CONCLUSIONS: Provider and payer representatives in 6 distinct geographic locations provided recommendations to improve quality of care in patients eligible for PCSK9i. Participants also provided tactical recommendations for streamlining PA documentation processes and improving awareness of PCSK9i cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy. The majority of participants supported development of universal, standardized patient eligibility criteria and PA forms. DISCLOSURES: The study reported in this article was part of a continuing education program funded by an independent educational grant awarded by Sanofi US and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals to PRIME Education. The grantor had no role in the study design, execution, analysis, or reporting. AMCP received grant funding from PRIME to assist in the study, as well as in writing the manuscript. McCormick, Bhatt, Bays, Taub, Caldwell, Guerin, Steinhoff, and Ahmad received an honorarium from PRIME for serving as faculty for the continuing education program. McCormick, Bhatt, Bays, Taub, Caldwell, Guerin, Steinhoff, and Ahmad were involved as participants in the study. Bhatt discloses the following relationships: Advisory board: Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Level Ex, Medscape Cardiology, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences; Board of directors: Boston VA Research Institute, Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data monitoring committees: Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo), Population Health Research Institute; Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org ; Vice chair , ACC Accreditation Committee), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology ), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention ), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Researc
机译:背景:虽然存在诸如标准疗法,但在动脉粥样硬化心血管疾病(ASCVD)或家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)患者中,存在多种障碍用于适当使用Proprotein转化酶枯草杆菌素/ kexin型9酶抑制剂(PCSK9i),尽管标准疗法,具有不充分控制的高胆固醇血症。在这些障碍中,高薪拒绝税率和经供应商的先前授权(PA)文件不足妨碍PCSK9i的最佳使用。目标:─方法:通过AMCP和主要教育的协作项目,3个付款人和3个提供商在美国的6个独立地点举行会议。对所选和后发后调查的响应是关于治疗障碍的态度和信念的变化,用于考虑PCSK9i治疗的脂质阈值,以及改进PA过程的策略。 Cox比例危险测试和渔民对患者的患者的统计学分析和核心间的态度变化的态度和分别为70mg / DL的患者(分别为78%-83%和44%-67%)或fh(22%) -39%和22%-33%)。对于FH的患者的患者(33%-72%,P = 0.019)而言,应达成严格的PA要求,并需要标准化PA要求(50%-83%,P = 0.034);在会议结束后,这些考虑因素仍然很高(89%)。大多数参与者支持患者治疗遵守教育计划(83%)和医师/员工PA进程(83%-94%)。结论:6个不同地理位置的提供商和付款人代表提供了提高符合PCSK9i患者的护理质量的建议。参与者还为简化了PA文件流程并提高了PCSK9i成本效益和临床疗效的认识,提供了战术建议。大多数参与者支持发展普遍,标准化的患者资格标准和PA表格。披露:本文报告的研究是由Sanofi US和Regeneron Pharmaceuticals向主要教育获得的独立教育补助金提供的持续教育计划的一部分。制定者在研究设计,执行,分析或报告中没有任何作用。 AMCP收到了批准的赠款,以协助研究,以及写作稿件。 McCormick,Bhatt,Bays,Taub,Caldwell,Guerin,Steinhoff和Ahmad获得了荣誉奖,作为持续教育计划的职业。 McCormick,Bhatt,Bays,Taub,Caldwell,Guerin,Steinhoff和Ahmad作为该研究的参与者涉及。 BHATT披露了以下关系:咨询委员会:Cardax,Cellprethea,Cereno Scientific,Elsevier实践更新心脏病学,水平Ex,Medscape心脏病学,Peplebio,Plx Pharma,Regado Biosciences;董事会:波士顿VA研究所,心血管患者护理社会,烟头;主席:美国心脏协会质量监督委员会;数据监测委员会:Baim临床研究所(以前哈佛临床研究所,用于Portico审判,由St. Jude Medical,NowBoutt),克利夫兰诊所(包括Edforwards资助的Feed Action),Contego Medical(Contego) ,表演2),杜克临床研究院,梅奥诊所,西奈山医学院(为戴西Sankyo资助的设想试验),人口卫生研究所;荣誉荣辱:美国心脏病学院(高级助理编辑,临床试验和新闻,ACC.ORG;副主席,ACC认证委员会),BAIM临床研究所(以前的哈佛临床研究所;重新双人PCI临床试验指导委员会资助Boehringer Ingelheim;由CSL Behring资助的Aegis-II执行委员会),Belvoir出版物(秘书长,哈佛心信),杜克临床研究所(临床试验委员会,包括由Werring Pharmaceuticals资助的审判发表),HMP Global (主编,侵入性心脏病学杂志),美国心脏病学杂志(Guest Editor;助理编辑),K2P(联合主席,跨学科课程),水平前,Medtelligence / Reachmd(CME指导委员会),MJH生活科学,人口卫生研究所(针对指南针运营委员会,出版委员会,指导委员会和美国国家联合领导者,由拜耳资助),SL ACK出版物(首席医学编辑,心脏病学,今天的干预),心血管患者护理(秘书/财务主管),WebMD(CME指导委员会);其他:临床心脏病学(副编辑),NCDR-ACTION登记转向委员会(主席),VA购物车研究和出版委员会(主席); res

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号