...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences >Strengthening RC flat slab-column connections with FRP composites: A review and comparative study
【24h】

Strengthening RC flat slab-column connections with FRP composites: A review and comparative study

机译:用FRP复合材料加强RC平板柱连接:综述和比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In recent years, strengthening through using fibre reinforcing polymer (FRP), has been widely used in buildings, especially slab-column connections. This is due to several reasons; such as the application of additional loads, incorrect analysis and design and others. There are many standards to deal with the FRP application. Each standard has its own specification, which differs from others. No comparison between the standards has been conducted to advise the designer to choose his suitable standards to design slab-column connections. In this paper, an attempt is made to make a comparison between design standards in strengthening flat slab-column connections using FRP to explain the differences between standards in design. This comparison is based on the American Concrete Institute (ACI), Concrete Society technical report 55 and Japanese Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), which are the only codes dealing with FRP plates or sheets. A numerical study was also conducted in this paper by using a finite element programme called ABAQUS to compare with the previous standards. As all the standards do not have a specific equation for the punching shear deals with FRP; a general equation derived by Farghaly and Ueda (2011) was used to address the slabs strengthened by FRP. From the results of the comparison, it can be seen that the Concrete Society technical report 55 gives the maximum value of the load, while the other codes result in a so closed values.
机译:近年来,使用纤维增强聚合物(FRP)加强,已广泛用于建筑物,尤其是平板柱连接。这是由于几个原因;例如应用额外的负载,不正确的分析和设计等。有许多标准可以处理FRP应用程序。每个标准都有自己的规格,与他人不同。没有对标准进行比较,建议设计师选择合适的标准来设计平板柱连接。在本文中,尝试使用FRP加强平板柱连接的设计标准进行比较,以解释设计标准之间的差异。这种比较基于美国具体研究所(ACI),具体社会技术报告55和日本土木工程师(JSCE),这是处理FRP板或床单的唯一代码。本文还通过使用称为ABAQUS的有限元件进行比较以与以前的标准进行比较,在本文中进行了数值研究。由于所有标准都没有用于FRP的冲压剪切处理的特定方程; Farghaly和UEDA(2011)源的一般方程被用来解决FRP加强的板坯。从比较结果中,可以看出具体社会技术报告55给出了负载的最大值,而其他代码会导致如此闭合的值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号