首页> 外文期刊>Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery >Artificial intelligence-based vessel suppression for detection of sub-solid nodules in lung cancer screening computed tomography
【24h】

Artificial intelligence-based vessel suppression for detection of sub-solid nodules in lung cancer screening computed tomography

机译:基于人工智能的血管抑制,用于检测肺癌中肺癌筛查计算断层扫描的血液结节

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps early lung cancer detection, commonly presenting as small pulmonary nodules. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based vessel suppression (AI-VS) and automatic detection (AI-AD) algorithm can improve detection of subsolid nodules (SSNs) on LDCT. We assessed the impact of AI-VS and AI-AD in detection and classification of SSNs [ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and part-solid nodules (PSNs)], on LDCT performed for LCS. Methods: Following regulatory approval, 123 LDCT examinations with sub-solid pulmonary nodules (average diameter ≥6 mm) were processed to generate three image series for each examination-unprocessed, AI-VS, and AI-AD series with annotated lung nodules. Two thoracic radiologists in consensus formed the standard of reference (SOR) for this study. Two other thoracic radiologists (R1 and R2; 5 and 10 years of experience in thoracic CT image interpretation) independently assessed the unprocessed images alone, then together with AI-VS series, and finally with AI-AD for detecting all ≥6 mm GGN and PSN. We performed receiver operator characteristics (ROC) and Cohen’s Kappa analyses for statistical analyses. Results: On unprocessed images, R1 and R2 detected 232/310 nodules (R1: 114 GGN, 118 PSN) and 255/310 nodules (R2: 122 GGN, 133 PSN), respectively (P0.05). On AI-VS images, they detected 249/310 nodules (119 GGN, 130 PSN) and 277/310 nodules (128 GGN, 149 PSN), respectively (P≥0.12). When compared to the SOR, accuracy (AUC) for detection of PSN on the AI-VS images (AUC 0.80–0.81) was greater than on the unprocessed images (AUC 0.70–0.76). AI-VS images enabled detection of solid components in five nodules deemed as GGN on the unprocessed images. Accuracy of AI-AD was lower than both the radiologists (AUC 0.60–0.72). Conclusions: AI-VS improved the detection and classification of SSN into GGN and PSN on LDCT of the chest for the two radiologist (R1 and R2) readers.
机译:背景技术:具有低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)的肺癌筛选(LCS)有助于早期肺癌检测,通常呈现为小肺结节。基于人工智能(AI)的血管抑制(AI-VS)和自动检测(AI-AD)算法可以改善LDCT上的检测子化结节(SSNS)。我们评估了在对LCS进行的LDCT上的SSNS [地面玻璃结节(GGNS)和部分固结节(PSNS)]的检测和分类中的影响和分类的影响。方法:调节批准后,加工123次LDCT对亚固体肺结核(平均直径≥6mm)的调查,为每个检查 - 未加工,AI-VS和AI-AD系列的三个图像系列产生带有带注释的肺结节。两个胸部放射科医生共识,形成了本研究的参考标准(SOR)。另外两位胸部放射科医生(R1和R2; 5和10年的胸廓CT图像解释经验)独立地评估了未处理的图像,然后与AI-VS系列一起,最后使用AI-AD检测所有≥6mmggn和PSN。我们执行了接收器操作员特征(ROC)和Cohen的Kappa分析进行统计分析。结果:在未加工的图像中,R1和R2检测到232/310结节(R1:114 Ggn,118 psn)和255/310结节(R2:122 ggn,133 psn)(p& 0.05)。在AI-VS图像上,它们分别检测到249/310结节(119Ggn,130 psn)和277/310结节(128 ggn,149 psn)(p≥0.12)。与SOR相比,在AI-VS图像上检测PSN的精度(AUC)大于未处理的图像(AUC 0.70-0.76)。 AI-VS图像使能在未处理的图像上被视为GGN的五个结节中的固体组件检测。 AI-AD的准确性低于放射科学家(AUC 0.60-0.72)。结论:AI-VS将SSN的检测和分类改进了两个放射科医生(R1和R2)读卡器的胸部LDCT上的GGN和PSN。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号