首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic surgery >Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study
【24h】

Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study

机译:经皮逆压力突脊髓内窥镜椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的评价:回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and open fenestration discectomy (OFD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods Patients in our hospital with LDH who received PTED ( n = 71) and OFD (n = 39) from 2013 to 2014 were retrospectively studied. Patient information, including age, gender, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, body weight, height, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and recurrence, was collected. The patients in the two groups were followed up for an average of 63?months after surgery. Results A total of 136 patients completed the operation and 110 patients were followed up completely. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups ( P ?0.05). The postoperative low back pain, leg pain, ODI, and JOA of the two groups were better than those preoperatively ( P ?0.05). At the end of the follow up, 89.7% (35/39) of patients in the OFD group had excellent improvement in the JOA score, and 88.7% (63/71) of patients in the PTED group had an excellent improvement. There was no significant difference between the two ( P ?0.05). There was also no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups [(5/71) vs (3/39); P ?0.05]. [Correction added on 05 March 2021, after first online publication: “3/29” was amended to “3/39” in the preceding sentence.] Conclusion Both PTED and OFD can achieve good mid‐term efficacy in the treatment of LDH but PTED has certain advantages, including the small incision, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker, earlier recovery. However, prospective randomized controlled studies with a larger sample size are needed.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估经皮透明突变体内窥镜分离术(PTED)和开绒面切除术(OFD)治疗腰椎间盘突出(LDH)的安全性和疗效。方法回顾性研究了从2013年至2014年接受PTED(n = 71)和OFD(n = 39)的LDH的患者。收集了患者信息,包括年龄,性别,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,用于低腰疼和腿部疼痛,体重,高度,OSWestry残疾指数(ODI),日本矫形协会(JOA)和复发。两组患者平均均为63次手术后63个月。结果共有136名患者完成手术,110名患者完全随访。两组之间的基线数据没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。两组术后低腰疼痛,腿部疼痛,odi和Joa比术前更好(p?0.05)。在随后的结束时,OFD组的89.7%(35/39)患者在JOA得分的良好改善,PTED组患者的88.7%(63/71)具有出色的改善。两者之间没有显着差异(p& 0.05)。两组之间的复发率没有显着差异[(5/71)vs(3/39); p& 0.05]。 [修正于2021年3月5日添加的修正后,在首次在线出版物之后:“3/29”在前面的句子中被修改为“3/39”。]结论均在治疗LDH时可以实现良好的中期疗效,但是PTED具有一定的优势,包括小切口,较短的住院住宿,更快,早期恢复。然而,需要具有较大样本大小的预期随机对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号