...
首页> 外文期刊>Minerva anestesiologica >Sublingual sufentanil tablet system for the management of acute postoperative pain in a hospital setting: an observational study
【24h】

Sublingual sufentanil tablet system for the management of acute postoperative pain in a hospital setting: an observational study

机译:舌下苏芬太尼片剂系统,用于医院环境中急性术后疼痛:观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The use of a strong opioid with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) is recommended for postoperative pain, but its use is restricted due to technical problems. Other delivery systems, like sublingual PCA, with the sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) device, could overcome the safety concerns related to IV-PCA. METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy, safety and usability of SSTS for post-surgical analgesia in the real-life setting. RESULTS: Two-hundred-ninety-eight subjects (125 males), ranging 18-87 years who were undergoing a surgical intervention with a necessity for postoperative analgesia in a hospital setting, were analyzed for SSTS efficacy and safety. The primary end point (success of treatment according to Patient Global Assessment of the Method of Pain Control [PGA] on the second postoperative day) was achieved in 89.8% (95% CI: 85.6-93.1%, P≤0.001 from a presumed value of 60%). During the first 24 hours, pain was below the baseline score (1.2±1.4 after four hours and 1.8±1.6 after 20 hours). The mean impairment in quality of sleep was 1.7±1.7 on postoperative day 1. The overall nurse ease of care (EOC) and nurses’ satisfaction questionnaire score was 4.6±0.6, and 4.1±0.9, respectively. The overall patient EOC score was 4.3±0.5; 93.5% patients were extremely satisfied/satisfied with pain control and 93.2% were extremely satisfied/satisfied with the way of the administration. CONCLUSIONS: Under a real-life clinical practice setting, SSTS provides effective pain management and is easy to use for patients and nurses.
机译:建议使用具有静脉内患者控制镇痛(IV-PCA)的强蛋白质进行术后疼痛,但由于技术问题,其使用受到限制。与舌下PCA一样,与Sufentanil平板电脑系统(SSTS)设备相同的其他送货系统可以克服与IV-PCA相关的安全问题。方法:该前瞻性观察研究评估了SSTS在现实生活中的外科镇痛后SST的功效,安全性和可用性。结果:两百九十八名受试者(125名男性),分析了医院环境中术后镇痛的手术干预的18-87岁,分析了SST的疗效和安全性。在89.8%(95%CI:85.6-93.1%,P≤0.001,从假定值中获得的主要终点(根据患者的疼痛控制方法[PGA]治疗方法的治疗方法的成功进行了全球评估。 60%)。在前24小时,疼痛低于基线评分(4小时后1.2±1.4,20小时后1.8±1.6)。术后第1天睡眠质量的平均损伤1.整体护士的护理(EOC)和护士的满意问卷评分分别为4.6±0.6和4.1±0.9。患者EOC得分为4.3±0.5; 93.5%患者非常满意/满足于疼痛控制,93.2%对管理的方式极为满意/满意。结论:在现实临床实践环境下,SST提供有效的疼痛管理,易于使用患者和护士。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号