首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit
【24h】

Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit

机译:语言评级规模和数值评级规模的比较研究评估麻醉后护理单位术后疼痛强度

获取原文
       

摘要

Postsurgical patients usually have difficulty in answering the self-report pain scales due to the residual effects of anesthetic or sedative agents in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). A comparative analysis of pain assessment tools used in the PACU is lacking. In this prospective observational study, we compared the intensity of pain using the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and the 4- category verbal rating scale (VRS) thrice, 5 minutes after PACU admission, 20 minutes after the first assessment, and just before discharge from the PACU in 200 patients undergone surgery. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between 2 scales, and the weighted kappa (k) coefficient was performed to evaluate inter-scale reliability. Response rates of the 2 scales were also compared. VRS and NRS were highly correlated during all 3 comparisons (r=0.767, 0.714, and 0.653, respectively; P.0001). Each category of VRS showed a statistically significant difference in pain intensity measured by NRS during all 3 assessments. Inter-scale reliability had a fair strength of agreement for all 3 measurements (weighted k=0.519, 95% CI: 0.421–0.618; weighted k=0.511, 95% C.I: 0.409–0.613; weighted k=0.452, 95% C.I: 0.352–0.551, respectively). VRS showed a higher response rate for PACU patients compared to NRS in all 3 measurements (96% vs 77.5%, 99% vs 81.5%, and 96.5% vs 86.5%, respectively; P.0001). In the PACU, VRS is a reasonable and practical pain intensity measurement tool for postsurgical patients, considering the high correlation between VRS and NRS, and a higher response rate. Abbreviations: IV-PCA = intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, NRS = numeric rating scale, PACU = post-anesthesia care unit, VAS = visual analog scale, VRS = verbal rating scale.
机译:由于麻醉剂或镇静剂在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)中的残留作用,后期患者通常难以回答自我报告疼痛尺度。缺乏对PACU中使用的疼痛评估工具的比较分析。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们将疼痛强度与11点数值评定量表(NRS)和4分类的口头评定量表(VRS)三分,5分钟后,第一次评估后20分钟,在200名患者中从PACU排放前进行手术。 Spearman等级相关性分析用于研究2刻度之间的相关性,并进行加权Kappa(k)系数以评估尺度间可靠性。还比较了2个尺度的响应率。在所有3个比较期间(r = 0.767,0.714和0.653分别是高度相关的VRS和NRS; P& .0001)。每类VRS在所有3个评估中都显示出NRS测量的疼痛强度差异差异。所有3次测量的尺度间可靠性具有公平的同意强度(加权K = 0.519,95%CI:0.421-0.618;加权k = 0.511,95%CI:0.409-0.613;加权k = 0.452,95%CI: 0.352-0.551分别)。 VRS对PACU患者的反应率较高,与所有3次测量的NRS相比在PACU中,VRS是后勤患者的合理和实用的疼痛强度测量工具,考虑到VRS和NRS的高相关以及更高的响应率。缩写:IV-PCA =静脉注射患者控制镇痛,NRS =数值评级规模,PACU =麻醉后护理单元,VAS = Visual模拟量表,VRS =口头评定量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号