首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions for knee with grade 2 medial collateral ligament injury
【24h】

Comparison between single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions for knee with grade 2 medial collateral ligament injury

机译:单束和双束前十字韧带重建的比较膝关节2级内侧侧缘韧带损伤

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT:This research discussed clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction accompanied by conservative treatment for grade 2 medial collateral ligament injury, and comparison was performed between double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Clinical information was retrospectively collected for 41 cases suffering anterior cruciate ligament injuries accompanied by grade 2 medial collateral ligament injuries. Within 14?days after their injuries 22 cases received single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SB group), while 19 were treated with double-bundle medial collateral ligament reconstruction (DB group). Physical statuses were estimated based on International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, Lachman, pivot shift and manual valgus test, and range of motion (ROM), while side-to-side difference was estimated through KT 2000 arthometer.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction accompanied by conservative treatment showed significantly improved anteroposterior, rotational and valgus stability, and IKDC and Lysholm scores (in comparison to pre-operative status, P??.05). Incidence of pivot shift was dramatically lower in DB group (2/19) than in SB group (7/22 and 2/22; P?=?.028). No substantial dissimilarity existed between DB and SB groups either in Lachman and valgus tests, KT 2000, ROM, IKDC, or Lysholm scores.Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction accompanied by conservative treatment could achieve outstanding stability and functional manifestations for cases facing anterior cruciate ligament injury accompanied by grade 2 medial collateral ligament injury. Moreover, double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle operation in treating rotational instability of the knee.Level of evidence: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.Copyright ? 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
机译:摘要:本研究讨论了前令韧带重建的临床结果,伴随保守治疗2级内侧副悬浮韧带损伤,并在双束和单束前十字架韧带重建之间进行比较。回顾性地收集了41例痛苦的临床信息前十字韧带损伤伴有2年级内侧副韧带损伤。在14岁以下的伤害后22例,接受单束前十字韧带重建(SB组),而19次用双束内侧副韧带重建(DB组)进行治疗。基于国际膝关节文件委员会(IKDC)和Lysholm分数,Lachman,枢轴换档和手动Valgus测试以及运动范围(ROM),估计通过KT 2000 Arthometer,基于国际膝盖文档委员会(IKDC)和Lysholm分数,Lachman,枢轴换档和手动Valgus测试以及侧侧差异.Anterior十字架保守治疗伴随的韧带重建显示出明显改善的前后,旋转和旋流稳定性和IKDC和Lysholm评分(与术前状态相比,p≤05)。 DB组(2/19)在Sb组(7/22和2/22; P?= 028)中,DB组(2/19)的发病率显着降低。在Lachman和Valgus测试中,KT 2000,ROM,IKDC或Lysholm评分中没有存在大量不同。伴随保守治疗的雌雄韧带重建可能会对面向前十字韧带损伤的病例伴随着突出的稳定性和功能表现通过2级内侧侧韧带损伤。此外,双束前十字架韧带重建优于处理膝关节旋转不稳定性的单束操作。透视的旋转不稳定性:回顾性比较研究,III级.Copyright? 2021提交人。由Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号