...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Efficacy of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract and Carotid Artery Velocity Time Integral as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock
【24h】

Efficacy of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract and Carotid Artery Velocity Time Integral as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock

机译:左心室流出道和颈动脉速度时间积分作为脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者流体反应性预测因子的疗效

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Transthoracic echocardiography is a reliable method to measure a dynamic change in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOTVTI) and stroke volume (SV) in response to passive leg raising (PLR) and can predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Measuring carotid artery velocity time integral (CAVTI) is easier, does not depend on adequate cardiac window, and requires less skill and expertise than LVOTVTI. The aim of this study is to identify the efficacy of ?CAVTI and ?LVOTVTI pre- and post-PLR in predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. Methods: After the institutional ethics committee’s clearance and informed written consent, 60 critically ill mechanically ventilated patients aged 18 to 65 years were recruited in this prospective parallel-group study with 20 patients in each group: sepsis (group S), septic shock (group SS), and control (group C). Demographic parameters and baseline acute physiology, age and chronic health evaluation-II and sequential organ failure assessment scores were noted. LVOTVTI, SV, and CAVTI were measured before and after PLR along with other hemodynamic variables. Patients having a change in SV more than 15% following PLR were defined as “responders.” Results: Twenty-three patients (38.33%) were responders. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve for ?CAVTI could predict responders in control and sepsis patients only. The correlation coefficients between pre- and post-PLR ?CAVTI and ?LVOTVTI were 0.530 (p = 0.016), 0.440 (p = 0.052), and 0.044 (p = 0.853) in control, sepsis, and septic shock patients, respectively. Conclusion: Following PLR, ?CAVTI does not predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients and the correlation between ?CAVTI and ?LVOTVTI is weak in septic shock patients and only modest in sepsis patients.
机译:背景技术响应被动腿饲养(PLR)是一种可靠的方法,可用于测量左心室流出道速度时间整体(LVOTVTI)和行程(SV)的动态变化,并且可以预测患有患者的患者的流体反应性。测量颈动脉速度时间整体(Cavti)更容易,不依赖于足够的心窗,并且需要比Lvotvti的技能和专业知识更少。本研究的目的是识别ΔChaTVTI的疗效,并在PLR预测患有脓毒症和脓毒症休克的患者患者中的流体反应性。方法:在制度伦理委员会的清算和知情书面同意之后,在这项前瞻性平行群体研究中招募了60名18至65岁的危重机械通风患者,每组20名患者:败血症(S),脓毒症休克(集团SS)和控制(C组)。注意到人口统计学参数和基线急性生理学,年龄和慢性健康评估-II和顺序器官失败评估分数。在PLR之前和之后测量LVOTVTI,SV和CAVTI以及其他血液动力学变量。在PLR后,SV的变化超过15%的患者被定义为“响应者”。结果:二十三名患者(38.33%)是响应者。接收器操作特性曲线下的区域可以预测对照和脓毒症患者的响应者。 PLR(PLR后的相关系数)分别对照,脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者的0.530(P = 0.016),0.440(P = 0.052),0.440(p = 0.052)和0.044(p = 0.853)。结论:遵循PLR,ΔChaCTI在脓毒症休克患者中没有预测流体反应性,并且在脓毒症休克患者中患者的相关性和Δlvotvti之间的相关性,并且在败血症患者中仅适度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号