首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Translational Research >Comparison in efficacy and safety of forceps biopsy for peripheral lung lesions guided by endobronchial ultrasound-guided sheath (EBUS-GS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with EBUS (ENB-EBUS)
【24h】

Comparison in efficacy and safety of forceps biopsy for peripheral lung lesions guided by endobronchial ultrasound-guided sheath (EBUS-GS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with EBUS (ENB-EBUS)

机译:钳子活检的疗效和安全性对外周超声引导鞘(EBUS-GS)和电磁导航支气管镜与EBUS(ENB-EBUS)进行的疗效和安全性的疗效和安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided sheath (EBUS-GS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with EBUS (ENB-EBUS) are two diagnostic methods used to obtain lung tissue for biopsy of peripheral lung lesions. This study retrospectively summarized the case data of patients who underwent EBUS-GS or ENB-EBUS, both procedures performed at the respiratory endoscopy center of Tangdu Hospital, and the study compared the diagnostic efficacy and complications of the two methods. The study included 93 patients who underwent EBUS-GS and 26 who underwent ENB-EBUS. The diagnostic rates of EBUS-GS and ENB-EBUS were 71.1% and 65.4%, respectively, with no statistical difference (P=0.581). Furthermore, 89.2% of patients in the EBUS-GS group were diagnosed with malignant disease, which was significantly higher than 23.5% diagnosed with malignant disease in the ENB-EBUS group (P=0.00). An analysis of the factors influencing the diagnosis rate showed that the diagnosis rate of EBUS-GS in cases with bronchial signs was 82.5%, which was significantly higher than the 42.9% in the cases in the ENB-EBUS group with bronchial signs (P0.05). Both EBUS-GS and ENB-EBUS can be used for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary disease. However, the diagnostic rate of EBUS-GS is significantly higher than ENB-EBUS in cases with bronchial signs associated with the lesion, and the diagnostic rate of ENB-EBUS in cases with no bronchial signs was higher than that of EBUS-GS with no statistical difference.
机译:结核超声引导的护套(EBUS-GS)和电磁导航支气管镜检查与EBUS(eNB-ebus)相结合,是用于获得肺组织的两种诊断方法,用于对周围肺病变的活检。本研究回顾性地总结了接受了EBUS-GS或ENB-EBUS的患者的病例数据,这两种程序都在唐德医院呼吸内窥镜检查中心进行,研究比较了两种方法的诊断疗效和并发症。该研究包括93名接受EBUS-GS和26岁的患者接受ENB-EBUS的患者。 EBUS-GS和ENB-EBUS的诊断率分别为71.1%和65.4%,没有统计学差异(P = 0.581)。此外,89.2%的EBUS-GS组患者被诊断出患有恶性疾病,其显着高于23.5%,在eNB-EBUS组(P = 0.00)中诊断出恶性疾病。影响诊断率的因素分析表明,在支气管迹象的情况下EBUS-GS的诊断率为82.5%,其中eNB-EBUS组中具有支气管标志(P0的病例中的42.9%)显着高于42.9%(P0。 05)。 EBUS-GS和ENB-EBUS均可用于诊断外周肺疾病。然而,在与病变相关的支气管标志的情况下,EBUS-GS的诊断率明显高于eNB-ebus,并且在没有支气管标志的情况下eNB-ebus的诊断率高于NO的eBus-GS统计差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号