首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer s Research & Therapy >Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease and for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in older patients with moderate and severe functional impairments: a systematic review of controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease and for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in older patients with moderate and severe functional impairments: a systematic review of controlled trials

机译:Alzheimer病药物治疗药物治疗的疗效和安全性和痴呆患者中度和严重功能损伤患者痴呆的行为和心理症状:对受控试验的系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Many patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are physically frail or have substantial functional impairments. There is growing evidence that such patients are at higher risk for medication-induced adverse events. Furthermore, frailty seems to be more predictive of poor clinical outcomes than chronological age alone. To our knowledge, no systematic review of clinical trials examining drug therapy of AD or behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) has specifically focused on the topic of physical frailty. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in AD patients with frailty or significant functional impairments. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug therapy of AD and BPSD in patients with significant functional impairments according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Cochrane research criteria. Significant functionally impaired patient populations were identified using the recommendations of the Medication and Quality of Life in frail older persons (MedQoL) Research Group. Screening, selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Outcomes including functional status, cognitive function, changes in BPSD symptoms, clinical global impression and quality of life were analysed. For assessing harm, we assessed adverse events, drop-outs as a proxy for treatment tolerability and death. Results were analysed according to Cochrane standards and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Of 45,045 search results, 38,447 abstracts and 187 full texts were screened, and finally, 10 RCTs were included in the systematic review. Selected articles evaluated pharmacotherapy with acetylcholinesterase-inhibitors (AChEI), anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics. Studies of AChEIs suggested that patients with significant functional impairments had slight but significant improvements in cognition and that AChEIs were generally well tolerated. Studies of antidepressants did not show significant improvements in depressive symptoms. Antipsychotics and anticonvulsants showed small effects on some BPSD items but also higher rates of adverse events. However, due to the very small number of identified trials, the quality of evidence for all outcomes was low to very low. Overall, the small number of eligible studies demonstrates that significantly functional impaired older patients have not been adequately taken into consideration in most clinical trials investigating drug therapy of AD and BPSD. Due to lack of evidence, it is not possible to give specific recommendations for drug therapy of AD and BSPD in frail older patients or older patients with significant functional impairments. Therefore, clinical trials focussing on frail older adults are urgently required. A standardized approach to physical frailty in future clinical studies is highly desirable.
机译:许多阿尔茨海默病(广告)的患者身体虚弱或具有实质性的障碍。越来越有证据表明,这些患者患有药物诱导的不良事件的风险较高。此外,脆弱似乎比单独的年龄年龄更高的临床结果更加预测。据我们所知,没有对临床试验的系统审查检查痴呆症(BPSD)的广告或行为和心理症状的药物治疗已经专门针对物理脆弱的话题。我们的目标是评估AD患者的药物治疗的疗效和安全性脆弱或显着的功能障碍。我们在患有可随机对照试验(RCTS)的受访控制试验(RCTS)的患者中进行了系统的文献搜索,用于随机对照试验(RCTS),在具有明显的系统评论的首选报告项目的患者中,在具有显着的职能障碍的患者中进行随机对照试验(RCT)和荟萃分析(PRISMA)陈述和Cochrane研究标准。使用脆弱年龄(MedQol)研究小组的药物药物和生活质量的建议确定了显着的功能受损的患者群体。通过两个审稿人独立地进行筛选,研究选择,数据提取和偏见评估风险。分析了包括功能状态,认知功能,BPSD症状的变化,临床全球印象和生活质量的结果。为了评估伤害,我们评估了不良事件,作为治疗侵染性和死亡的代理。结果根据Cochrane标准分析和建议评估,开发和评估(等级)方法的分析。在45,045个搜索结果中,38,447个摘要和187个完整的文本被筛选,最后,系统审查中包含10个RCT。所选物品评估了用乙酰胆碱酯酶 - 抑制剂(ACHEI),抗惊厥药,抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的药物治疗。 acheis的研究表明,具有显着功能性障碍的患者对认知具有轻微但显着的改善,并且疼痛通常耐受性。抗抑郁药的研究没有显示出抑郁症状的显着改善。抗精神病药和抗惊厥药对一些BPSD物品表现出小的影响,但也具有更高的不良事件率。然而,由于较少数量的识别试验,所有结果的证据质量低至很低。总体而言,少数合格研究表明,在研究AD和BPSD的药物治疗的大多数临床试验中,尚未充分考虑到明显的功能受损的老年患者。由于证据缺乏证据,不可能在虚弱的年龄患者或老年患者中给予AD和BSPD的药物治疗的特定建议。因此,迫切需要关注脆弱年龄成年人的临床试验。非常需要在未来的临床研究中进行实际脆弱的标准化方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号