...
首页> 外文期刊>Biology of sport / >Effect of formation, ball in play and ball possession on peak demands in elite soccer
【24h】

Effect of formation, ball in play and ball possession on peak demands in elite soccer

机译:形成,球在比赛中的影响,球占据精英足球峰值需求

获取原文
           

摘要

This study examined the most demanding passages of match play (MDP) and the effects of playing formation, ball-in-play (BiP) time and ball possession on the 1-min peak (1-min peak ) demand in elite soccer. During 18 official matches, 305 individual samples from 223 Italian Serie A soccer players were collected. MDP and 1-min peak were calculated across playing position (central defenders, wide defenders, central midfielders, wide midfielders, wide forwards and forwards). Maximum relative (m·min -1 ) total distance (TD), high-speed running (HSR), very high-speed running (VHSR), sprint (SPR), acceleration/deceleration (Acc/Dec), estimated metabolic power (P met ) and high-metabolic load (HML) distance were calculated across different durations (1–5, 10, 90 min) using a rolling method. Additionally, 1-min peak demand was compared across playing formation (3-4-1-2, 3-4-2-1, 3-5-2, 4-3-3, 4-4-2), BiP and ball/no-ball possession cycles. MDP showed large to verylarge [effect-size (ES): 1.20/4.06] differences between 1-min peak vs all durations for each parameter. In 1-min peak , central midfielders and wide midfielders achieved greater TD and HSR (ES:0.43/1.13) while wide midfielders and wide forwards showed greater SPR and Acc/Dec (ES:0.30/1.15) than other positions. For VHSR, SPR and Acc/Dec 1-min peak showed fourfold higher locomotor requirements than 90-min. 1-min peak for Acc/Dec was highest in 4-3-3 for forwards, central and wide midfielders. 1-min Peak was lower during peak BiP (BiP peak ) for HSR, VHSR and Acc/Dec (ES: -2.57/-1.42). Comparing with vs without ball possession, BiP peak was greater (ES: 0.06/1.48) in forwards and wide forwards and lower (ES: -2.12/-0.07) in central defenders and wide defenders. Positional differences in MDP, 1-min peak and BiP peak were observed. Soccer-specific drills should account for positional differences when conditioning players for the peak demands. This may help practitioners to bridge the training/match gap.
机译:本研究审查了最苛刻的比赛段落(MDP)和竞争地层,球场(BIP)时间和球占据精英足球中的1分钟(1分钟)需求的效果。在18次官方比赛期间,收集了来自223个意大利意甲足球运动员的305个单独样品。 MDP和1分钟的峰值计算在播放位置(中央卫队,宽阔的防守者,中间地区,广泛的中场,宽前锋和前锋)。最大相对(M·MIN -1)总距离(TD),高速运行(HSR),非常高速运行(VHSR),Sprint(SPR),加速/减速(ACC / DEC),估计代谢功率(使用轧制方法,通过不同的持续时间(1-5,10,90分钟)计算P遇到)和高代谢负载(HML)距离。此外,比较1分钟的峰值需求,横跨播放形成(3-4-1-2,3-4-2-1,3-5-2,4-3-3,4-4-2),BIP和球/无球占有循环。 MDP展示大于eSTRAGGE [效果 - 尺寸:1.20 / 4.06]差异,每个参数的所有持续时间达到1分钟。在1分钟的峰值中,中部中场和宽的中场员达到了更大的TD和HSR(ES:0.43 / 1.13),而宽的中场和宽前锋显示出比其他位置更大的SPR和ACC / Dec(ES:0.30 / 1.15)。对于VHSR,SPR和ACC / DEC 1-MIN峰值显示超过90分钟的四倍高的运动量要求。 ACC / DEC的1分钟峰位于4-3-3的前进,中央和广域网。 HSR,VHSR和ACC / Dec(ES:-2.57 / -1.42)峰值BIP(BIP峰)期间1分钟峰值较低(ES:-2.57 / -1.42)。与没有球占有的VS比较,BIP峰在中央维尔德和宽阔的防守者中越来越大(ES:0.06 / 1.48),更大(ES:0.06 / 1.48),宽阔(ES:-2.12 / -0.07)。观察到MDP,1分钟峰和BIP峰的位置差异。足球练习应该在调节峰值需求的调节玩家时解释位置差异。这可能有助于从业者弥合培训/匹配差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号