首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation
【24h】

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

机译:微观镜片椎间盘切除术的随访结果与日常手术相比,使用经皮内窥镜腰椎切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is satisfactory for hospitalized patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Currently, only a few studies have reported about the day surgery patients undergoing PELD.METHODS:A total of 267 patients with LDH underwent PELD during day surgery and were followed up for at least 3?years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and lower back pain (VAS-B and VAS-L, respectively) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI). The radiological outcomes, such as lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the disc-height ratio, and disc instability, were recorded and compared. The clinical effects between patients treated by PELD during day surgery and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for contemporaneous hospitalized 116 patients with LDH were compared.RESULTS:Patients treated by PELD had lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay (P???0.001) compared to those treated by MED. VAS-L, VAS-B, and ODI decreased significantly after PELD than before the operation and 3?years postoperatively. The postoperative VAS-B in the PELD group was significantly decreased than in the MED group (P?=?0.001). The complications rate was 9.4% in the PELD group and 12.1% in the MED group (P?=?0.471). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rate in the PELD group was much higher than that in MED group (P?=?0.042). The postoperative LL and SS in the PELD group improved significantly compared to the values in the MED group (P???0.001). According to the disc-height ratio at 3-year follow-up, a significant height loss was observed in the MED group than in the PELD group (P?=?0.014).CONCLUSIONS:Although the 1-year postoperative recurrence rate was relatively high, the day surgery for LDH undergoing PELD had advantages in terms of less blood loss intraoperatively, short hospital stay, efficacy for back pain, and efficiency to maintain lumbar physiological curvature.
机译:背景:经皮内窥镜腰椎切除术(PELD)对于住院患者患者患者令人满意的腰椎间盘突出(LDH)。目前,只有少数研究报告了接受PELD的日常手术患者。方法:每天在白天手术期间共有267例LDH患者,并进行了至少3年的时间。使用腿部和下背部疼痛(分别的腰部疼痛(分别为腰部疼痛(VAS-B和VAS-L)和OSWESTRY残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结果。记录并比较腰雄激素(LL),骶骨斜率(SS),骶骨斜率(SS),骶骨斜率(SS),椎间盘高比和盘不稳定性。在白天外科和微观静脉切除术期间(MED)治疗的患者患者对LDH的同期治疗患者的临床疗效。结果:PELD治疗的患者降低了血液损失和较短的住院停留(P?& 0.001)与Med治疗的人相比。 PLED后VAS-L,VAS-B和ODI明显减少,比在手术前和3年术后3年。 PELD组的术后VAS-B显着降低于MED组(P?= 0.001)。 PELD组的并发症率为9.4%,MED组中12.1%(p?= 0.471)。 PELD组的1年术后复发率远高于MED组(P?= 0.042)。 PELD组的术后L1和SS与MED组中的值相比显着改善(P ?? 0.001)。根据3年后的椎间盘高比率,在Med组中观察到比PELD组的显着高度损失(P?= 0.014)。结论:虽然术后复发率相对高,接受PLED的LDH的当天手术在缺血性血液丧失,短期住院,痛苦的疗效和效率方面具有优势,效率保持腰椎生理曲率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号