...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Stratified care integrated with eHealth versus usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Stratified care integrated with eHealth versus usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:分层护理与eHealth与常规初级保健物理治疗颈部和/或肩部投诉患者的常规保健:组合随机对照试验的议定书

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Background Neck and shoulder complaints are common in primary care physiotherapy. These patients experience pain and disability, resulting in high societal costs due to, for example, healthcare use and work absence. Content and intensity of physiotherapy care can be matched to a patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain. Mode of care delivery can be matched to the patient’s suitability for blended care (integrating eHealth with physiotherapy sessions). It is hypothesized that combining these two approaches to stratified care (referred to from this point as Stratified Blended Approach) will improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints compared to usual physiotherapy. Methods This paper presents the protocol of a multicenter, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial. A total of 92 physiotherapists will be recruited from Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices. Physiotherapy practices will be randomized to the Stratified Blended Approach arm or usual physiotherapy arm by a computer-generated random sequence table using SPSS (1:1 allocation). Number of physiotherapists (1 or??1) will be used as a stratification variable. A total of 238 adults consulting with neck and/or shoulder complaints will be recruited to the trial by the physiotherapy practices. In the Stratified Blended Approach arm, physiotherapists will match I) the content and intensity of physiotherapy care to the patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain, categorized as low, medium or high (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool) and II) the mode of care delivery to the patient’s suitability and willingness to receive blended care. The control arm will receive physiotherapy as usual. Neither physiotherapists nor patients in the control arm will be informed about the Stratified Blended Approach arm. The primary outcome is region-specific pain and disability (combined score of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index & Neck Pain and Disability Scale) over 9?months. Effectiveness will be compared using linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal and healthcare perspective. Discussion The trial will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Stratified Blended Approach compared with usual physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL8249 . Officially registered since 27 December 2019. Date of first enrollment: 30 September 2020. Study status: ongoing, data collection.
机译:摘要背景颈部和肩部抱怨在初级保健物理治疗中是常见的。这些患者经历了疼痛和残疾,导致例如高医疗使用和工作缺席的社会成本高。物理治疗的内容和强度可以与患者持续伤害疼痛的风险相匹配。护理方式可以与患者的混合护理的适用性相匹配(与物理治疗会话整合)。假设是将这两种方法与分层护理(从这一点称为分层混合方法)组合将提高颈部和/或肩部投诉患者的物理治疗的有效性和成本效益与通常的物理治疗相比。方法本文介绍了多中心,务实,双臂,并行组,集群随机对照试验的协议。共有92名物理治疗师将从荷兰初级保健物理治疗实践中招募。 (1只分配1)理疗做法将通过使用SPSS一个计算机生成的随机序列表进行随机化到分层混合方法臂或通常理疗臂。物理治疗师(1或β1)的数量将用作分层变量。共有238名成年人与颈部和/或肩部投诉进行咨询,将招募物理治疗实践的审判。在分层混合方法手臂中,物理治疗师将匹配i)物理疗法的内容和强度,对患者持续禁用疼痛的风险,分类为低,中或高(使用Keele开始MSK工具)和II)护理方式交付给患者的适用性和愿意接受混合护理。控制臂将像往常一样接受物理疗法。既不会对控制臂中的物理治疗师和患者提供关于分层混合方法的患者。主要结果是区域特异性疼痛和残疾(肩部疼痛和残疾指数和颈部疼痛和残疾秤的综合评分)超过9?几个月。使用线性混合模型进行比较有效性。将从社会和医疗保健角度进行经济评估。讨论该试验将是第一个提供有关分层混合方法的有效性和成本效益的证据,与颈部和/或肩部投诉患者的常规物理疗法相比。审判登记荷兰试验登记册:NL8249。自2019年12月27日以来正式注册。首次入学日期:2020年9月30日。研究状况:正在进行的,数据收集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号