...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >A comparison of orthopaedic surgery and internal?medicine perceptions of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring
【24h】

A comparison of orthopaedic surgery and internal?medicine perceptions of USMLE Step 1 pass/fail scoring

机译:矫形外科和内部的比较和内部?Musmle的医学看法第1步骤1通过/失败得分

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 will transition from numeric grading to pass/fail, sometime after January 2022. The aim of this study was to compare how program directors in orthopaedics and internal medicine perceive a pass/fail Step 1 will impact the residency application process. A 27-item survey was distributed through REDCap to 161?U.S. orthopaedic residency program directors and 548?U.S. internal medicine residency program directors. Program director emails were obtained from the American Medical Association’s Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. We received 58 (36.0%) orthopaedic and 125 (22.8%) internal medicine program director responses. The majority of both groups disagree with the change to pass/fail, and felt that the decision was not transparent. Both groups believe that the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge exam and clerkship grades will take on more importance. Compared to internal medicine PDs, orthopaedic PDs were significantly more likely to emphasize research, letters of recommendation from known faculty, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, leadership/extracurricular activities, audition elective rotations, and personal knowledge of the applicant. Both groups believe that allopathic students from less prestigious medical schools, osteopathic students, and international medical graduates will be disadvantaged. Orthopaedic and internal medicine program directors agree that medical schools should adopt a graded pre-clinical curriculum, and that there should be a cap on the number of residency applications a student can submit. Orthopaedic and internal medicine program directors disagree with the change of Step 1 to pass/fail. They also believe that this transition will make the match process more difficult, and disadvantage students from less highly-regarded medical schools. Both groups will rely more heavily on the Step 2 clinical knowledge exam score, but orthopaedics will place more importance on research, letters of recommendation, Alpha Omega Alpha membership, leadership/extracurricular activities, personal knowledge of the applicant, and audition electives.
机译:美国医疗许可考试步骤1将从数值分级转换到通过/失败,1月2022年1月之后的某个时间。本研究的目的是为了比较骨科和内科的计划董事如何感知通过/失败步骤1将影响居住权申请过程。通过Redcap分发了27件商品调查?U.S。矫形居住计划董事和548年?美国。内科居住计划董事。计划总监电子邮件是从美国医学协会的奖学金和居住电子互动数据库获得的。我们收到了58(36.0%)骨科和125(22.8%)内科部门主任答复。两组的大多数群体不同意通过/失败的变化,并觉得决定并不透明。两组都认为,第2步临床知识考试和职员等级将采取更多重要性。与内部医学PDS相比,矫形PDS明显更有可能强调研究,已知教师的推荐信,阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法成员资格,领导/课外活动,试镜选择性旋转以及申请人的个人知识。两组都认为,来自较为着名的医学院,骨质化学生和国际医学毕业生的分派学生将处于不利地位。矫形和内科项目董事认为,医学院应采用分级前课程,并且应该有一个关于学生可以提交的居住申请人数的章程。矫形和内部医学计划董事不同意第1步骤1的变更。他们还认为,这一转型将使比赛过程更加困难,并且劣势学生免受高度高度的医学院。两组均依赖于第2步临床知识考试评分,但骨科将对研究,推荐信,阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法成员,领导/课外活动,申请人的个人知识以及试镜选修课。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号