首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia
【24h】

Process evaluation of a tailored intervention to Reduce Inappropriate psychotropic Drug use in nursing home residents with dementia

机译:在患有痴呆症的护理家庭居民中减少不恰当的精神药物使用的过程评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Research suggests that collaborative and tailored approaches with external expertise are important to process implementations. We therefore performed a process evaluation of an intervention using participatory action research, tailored information provision, and external coaching to reduce inappropriate psychotropic drug use among nursing home residents with dementia. The process evaluation was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial assessing the utility of this approach. We used Leontjevas’ model of process evaluation to guide data collection and analysis, focusing on the relevance and feasibility, extent of performance, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data on the relevance and feasibility and on the extent of performance were collected using a questionnaire targeting internal project leaders at nursing homes and our external coaches. Implementation barriers and facilitators were identified by individual semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to structure and describe the identified barriers and facilitators. The intervention was viewed positively, but it was also considered time consuming due to the involvement of many people and designing a tailored action and implementation plan was viewed as complex. The extent of performance differed between nursing homes. Delays in implementation and suboptimal execution of actions may have reduced effectiveness of the RID intervention in some nursing homes. Barriers to implementation were reorganizations, staff turnover, communication issues, unclear expectations, and perceived time pressures. Implementation also depended on the involvement and skills of key stakeholders, and organizations’ readiness to change. Although external coaches stimulated implementation, their additional value was rated variably across organizations. Barriers to implementation occurred on several levels and some barriers appear to be inherent to the nursing home environment and could be points of leverage of future implementation trajectories. This underlines the importance of assessing and supporting organizations in their readiness to change. Sensitivity analyses, taking into account the week in which nursing homes started with implementation and the degree to which actions were implemented as intended, will be appropriate in the effect analyses of the trial.
机译:研究表明,外部专业知识的协作和量身定制的方法对于处理实施很重要。因此,我们对使用参与行动研究,量身定制的信息提供以及外部教练进行了处理的过程评估,以减少患有痴呆症的护理家庭居民中的不恰当的精神药物使用。该过程评估与随机对照试验一起进行评估该方法的效用。我们使用了Leontjevas的过程评估模型来指导数据收集和分析,重点关注执行的相关性和可行性,绩效程度和障碍和促进者的实施。关于相关性和可行性以及在养老院和外部教练的调查问卷收集了表现的相关性和性能程度。各个半结构性访谈确定实施障碍和促进者。综合实施研究框架用于结构和描述所识别的障碍和促进者。干预措施是积极的,但由于许多人的参与,它也被认为是耗时的耗时,并且设计了定制的行动和实施计划被视为复杂。疗养院之间的性能程度不同。实施延误和行动的次优执行可能会降低一些护理家庭的脱脂干预的有效性。实施的障碍是重组,员工营业额,沟通问题,不明确的期望,以及感知时间压力。实施也取决于关键利益攸关方的参与和技能,以及组织准备改变。虽然外部教练受到刺激的实施,但它们的额外价值是可变的组织。实施的障碍发生在几个层面上,一些障碍似乎是护理家庭环境所固有的,并且可能是未来实施轨迹的杠杆作用。这强调了评估和支持组织准备改变的重要性。敏感性分析,考虑到养老院从实施的一周以及按预期实施行动的程度,将适用于试验的效果分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号