...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Can dedicated emergency team and area for older people reduce the hospital admission rate? - An observational pre- and post-intervention study
【24h】

Can dedicated emergency team and area for older people reduce the hospital admission rate? - An observational pre- and post-intervention study

机译:专用的紧急团队和老年人的地区可以减少医院入学率吗? - 一个观察到的后期和干预后的研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Emergency department (ED) care of older patients is often complex. Geriatric ED guidelines can help to meet this challenge. However, training requirements, the use of time-consuming tools for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a lack of golden standard to identify the frail patients, and the weak evidence of positive outcomes of using CGA in EDs pose barriers to introduce the guidelines. Dedicating an interprofessional team of regular ED medical and nursing staff and an older-friendly ED area can be another approach. Previous studies of geriatrician-led CGA in EDs have reported a reduced hospital admission rate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a dedicated interprofessional emergency team also can reduce the hospital admission rate without the resources required by the formal use of CGA. An observational pre-post study at a large adult ED, where all patients 80?years or older arriving on weekdays in the intervention period from 2016.09.26 to 2016.11.28 and the corresponding weekdays in the previous year from 2015.09.28 to 2015.11.30 were included. In the intervention period, older patients either received care in the geriatric module by the dedicated team or in the regular team modules for patients of mixed ages. In 2015, all patients received care in regular team modules. The primary outcome measure was the total hospital admission rate and the ED length of stay was the secondary outcome measure. We included 2377 arrivals in the intervention period, when 26.7% (N?=?634) received care in the geriatric module, and 2207 arrivals in the 2015 period. The total hospital admission rate was 61.7% (N?=?1466/2377) in the intervention period compared to 64.8% (N?=?1431/2207) in 2015 (p?=?0.03). The difference was larger for patients treated in the geriatric module, 51.1% compared to 62.1% (95% CI: 56.3 to 68.0%) for patients who would have been eligible in 2015. The ED length of stay was longer in the intervention period. An interprofessional team and area dedicated to older patients was associated to a lower hospital admission rate. Further studies are needed to confirm the results.
机译:急诊部(ED)较老年患者的护理往往很复杂。 Geriatric ED指南可以帮助满足这一挑战。但是,培训要求,使用耗时工具综合老年评估(CGA),缺乏金色标准来识别脆弱患者,以及使用CGA在EDS造成障碍的积极结果的弱证据介绍了指导。致力于常规ED医疗和护理人员的贸易组织,旧友好的ED区域可以是另一种方法。以前对EDS中的GeriAtrician-LED CGA的研究报告了医院入院率降低。本研究的目的是调查专门的专业急诊团队是否还可以减少医院入学率,而无需正式使用CGA所需的资源。在大型成人ED的观察前研究,所有患者80岁的患者在2016年从2016.09.26至2016.11.28到2016.11.28到2016.11.28到2015.09.28至2015年到2015年到2015年到2015年到2015年至2016.11年的相应工作日。包括包括30个。在干预期间,老年患者通过专门的团队或在常规团队模块中接受了特性模块的护理,用于混合年龄的患者。 2015年,所有患者在常规团队模块中接受了护理。主要结果措施是医院总入学率,ED的逗留时间是二次结果措施。我们在干预期内包括2377次抵达,当时26.7%(n?=?634)在老年模块中收到护理,2015年期间的2207个抵达。在干预期内,总医院入学率为61.7%(n?= 1466/2377),而2015年(p?= 0.03)。在老年模块中治疗的患者,51.1%的患者差异较大,而在2015年符合的患者的62.1%(95%CI:56.3%至68.0%)。干预期间ED的逗留时间更长。致力于老年患者的贸易委员会和区域与较低的医院入学率相关。需要进一步研究来确认结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号