首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Cost effectiveness of using Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) as an initial diagnostic investigation for patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of malignancy
【24h】

Cost effectiveness of using Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) as an initial diagnostic investigation for patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of malignancy

机译:使用粪免疫化素测试(FIT)作为胃肠道症状患者暗示恶性肿瘤的初始诊断调查的成本有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

There has been an increase in the numbers of patients presenting to primary care with suspected colorectal malignancy and subsequently an increase in demand for endoscopy. This study aims to forecast the cost of faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) compared to conventional diagnostic tests as a primary investigation for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal malignancy. Retrospectively, 1950 patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal malignancy who were referred through primary care and underwent investigations through standard endoscopic evaluation were included. These patients were used to forecast the cost of faecal immunochemical testing creating theoretical data for sensitivity and specificity. Outcome measures included: the number of investigations under current protocol; cost of current investigations; number of predicted false negatives and false positives and positive/negative predictive values using current sensitivity data for FIT; the cost forecast of using FIT as the primary investigation for colorectal malignancy. Median age was 65 (IQR 47–82) with 43.7% male and 56.3% female. A total of 1950 investigations were carried out with a diagnostic yield of 26 cancers (18 colon, 8 rectal), 138 polyps and 29 high risk adenomas (HGD?± ?10?mm). In total, £713,948 was spent on the investigations. The commonest investigation was colonoscopy totalling £533,169. The total cost per cancer diagnosis was £27,459. Sensitivity (92.1% CI 86.9–95.3) and specificity (85.8% CI 78.3–90.1) for FIT in colorectal cancer was taken from NICE and was costed via the manufacturer(s). The projected total cost of FIT for the same population using a?≥?4?μg haemoglobin cut off was £415,680 (£15,554 per cancer). The total cost of high-risk polyps using?≥?4?μg cut off was £404,427 (sensitivity 71.2% CI 60.5–87.2, specificity 79.8%CI 76.1–83.7) or £13,945 per polyp. FIT is a cheaper and effective alternative test with the potential to replace current expensive methods. The forecast is based on the limited data available for sensitivity/specificity in the current literature. FIT has now been commenced for symptomatic patients in the UK and therefore sensitivity may change in the future.
机译:患有疑似结肠直肠恶性肿瘤的初级保健的患者的数量增加,随后对内窥镜检查的需求增加。本研究旨在预测与常规诊断试验相比粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)的成本作为症状患者暗示结直肠恶性肿瘤的初步调查。回顾性地,包括通过初级保健和通过标准内窥镜评估进行初步治疗和接受调查的结直肠恶性肿瘤症状的症状患者。这些患者用于预测粪便免疫化学测试的成本,从而为敏感性和特异性创造理论数据。结局措施包括:当前议定书项下的调查次数;当前调查的成本;预测假否定的数量和使用电流灵敏度数据的误报和阳性/否定预测值;拟合的成本预测作为结肠直肠恶性肿瘤的主要研究。中位年龄为65(IQR 47-82),男性43.7%和56.3%的女性。共有1950年的调查,诊断产量为26例(18种结肠,8直肠),138个息肉和29个高风险腺瘤(HGDα±&?10?mm)。总共有713,948英镑的调查。最常见的调查是结肠镜检查总额为533,169英镑。每癌症诊断的总成本为27,459英镑。从漂亮的敏感性(85.8%CI 86.9-95.3)和特异性(85.8%CI 78.3-90.1)的特异性(85.8%CI 78.3-90.1)从尼斯中取出,并通过制造商成本耗费。预计使用a的相同群体的预计总成本?≥?4?μg血红蛋白切断为415,680英镑(每癌症15,554英镑)。使用Δ≥4Ω·4μg的高风险息肉的总成本为404,427英镑(灵敏度71.2%CI 60.5-87.2,特异性79.8%CI 76.13.7)或每息£13,945。 FIT是一种更便宜且有效的替代测试,潜力替代电流昂贵的方法。预测基于目前文献中可用于敏感性/特异性的有限数据。现在已经开始为英国的症状患者开始,因此对未来可能会发生敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号