...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention
【24h】

Facilitating advance care planning in the general practice setting for patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness: protocol for a phase-III cluster-randomized controlled trial and process evaluation of the ACP-GP intervention

机译:促进慢性寿命疾病患者的一般实践环境中的预先保健规划:III期簇随机对照试验的协议和ACP-GP干预的过程评估

获取原文

摘要

Advance care planning (ACP), a process of communication about patients’ preferences for future medical care, should be initiated in a timely manner. Ideally situated for this initiation is the general practitioner (GP). The intervention to improve the initiation of ACP for patients with a chronic life-limiting illness in general practice (ACP-GP) includes an ACP workbook for patients, ACP communication training for GPs, planned ACP conversations, and documentation of ACP conversation outcomes in a structured template. We present the study protocol of a Phase-III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of ACP-GP that aims to evaluate its effects on outcomes at the GP, patient, and surrogate decision maker (SDM) levels; and to assess the implementation process of the intervention. This RCT will take place in Flanders, Belgium. Thirty-six GPs, 108 patients with a chronic, life-limiting illness, and their (potential) SDM will be recruited, then cluster-randomized to the ACP-GP intervention or the control condition. The primary outcome for GPs is ACP self-efficacy; primary outcome for patients is level of ACP engagement. Secondary outcomes for GPs are ACP practices, knowledge and attitudes; and documentation of ACP discussion outcomes. Secondary outcomes for patients are quality of life; anxiety; depression; appointment of an SDM; completion of new ACP documents; thinking about ACP; and communication with the GP. The secondary outcome for the SDM is level of engagement with ACP. A process evaluation will assess the recruitment and implementation of the intervention using the RE-AIM framework. While the general practice setting holds promise for timely initiation of ACP, there is a lack of randomized trial studies evaluating the effectiveness of ACP interventions implemented in this setting. After this Phase-III RCT, we will be able to present valuable evidence of the effects of this ACP-GP intervention, with the potential for offering a well-tested and evaluated program to be implemented in general practice. The results of the process evaluation will provide insight into what contributes to or detracts from implementation success, as well as how the intervention can be adapted to specific contexts or needs. Prospectively registered at with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN12995230 ); registered 19/06/2020.
机译:预先关心规划(ACP),应及时启动关于未来医疗的患者偏好的沟通过程。理想情况下,该启动是一般的从业者(GP)。在一般实践中改善慢性寿命疾病的患者(ACP-GP)的患者的干预包括患者的ACP工作手册,针对GPS,计划ACP对话和ACP对话结果的文件结构化模板。我们介绍了ACP-GP的III期随机对照试验(RCT)的研究方案,旨在评估其对GP,患者和代理决策者(SDM)水平的结果的影响;并评估干预的实施过程。该RCT将在比利时弗兰德斯举行。将招募三十六个GPS,108名患有慢性寿命的疾病和(潜在)SDM的患者,然后将随机组成为ACP-GP干预或控制条件。 GPS的主要结果是ACP自我效能。患者的主要结果是ACP参与的水平。 GPS的二次结果是ACP实践,知识和态度;和ACP讨论结果的文件。患者的二次结果是生活质量;焦虑;沮丧;任命SDM;完成新的ACP文件;思考ACP;和与GP的沟通。 SDM的次要结果是与ACP的接合水平。过程评估将评估使用重新瞄准框架的招聘和实施干预。虽然一般练习设定保持承担及时启动ACP的承诺,但缺乏随机试验研究,评估本环境中实施的ACP干预措施的有效性。在此阶段III RCT之后,我们将能够提出本ACP-GP干预效果的有价值的证据,具有在一般实践中提供经过良好测试和评估计划的潜力。过程评估的结果将对有助于或减损执行成功的洞察力,以及干预如何适应特定的背景或需求。潜在于ISRCTN(ISRCTN12995230)的预期注册;注册19/06/2020。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号