...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers in the intensive care unit: a systematic review
【24h】

Bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

机译:在重症监护病员中支持非正式护理人员的丧亲丧亲措施:系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Informal caregivers of critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICUs) experience negative psychological sequelae that worsen after death. We synthesized outcomes reported from ICU bereavement interventions intended to improve informal caregivers’ ability to cope with grief. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers of adult patients who died in ICU. Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Bereavement interventions were categorized according to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence three-tiered model of bereavement support according to the level of need: (1) Universal information provided to all those bereaved; (2) Selected or targeted non-specialist support provided to those who are at-risk of developing complex needs; and/or (3) Professional specialist interventions provided to those with a high level of complex needs. Outcome measures were synthesized according to core outcomes established for evaluating bereavement support for adults who have lost other adults to illness. Three studies of ICU bereavement interventions from 31 ICUs across 26 hospitals were included. One trial examining the effect of family presence at brain death assessment integrated all three categories of support but did not report significant improvement in emotional or psychological distress. Two other trials assessed a condolence letter intervention, which did not decrease grief symptoms and may have increased symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and a storytelling intervention that found no significant improvements in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, or complicated grief. Four of nine core bereavement outcomes were not assessed anytime in follow-up. Currently available trial evidence is sparse and does not support the use of bereavement interventions for informal caregivers of critically ill patients who die in the ICU.
机译:重症监护单位(ICU)危重病患者的非正式护理人员体验死亡后恶化的负面心理后遗症。我们综合从ICU丧亲丧失干预措施报告,旨在改善非正式护理人员应对悲伤的能力。从成立到10月2020年10月的Medline,Embase,Cinahl和Psycinfo.禁止干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)支持ICU死亡的成人患者的非正式护理人员。两个审阅者独立提取数据重复。进行叙事合成。丧亲休息期根据英国国家健康和临床卓越卓越级别的丧亲支持模型,根据需要的水平:(1)向所有受虐待的普遍信息提供普遍信息; (2)向那些有风险发展复杂需求的人提供或针对性的非专家支持;和/或(3)专业专业干预措施提供给具有高度复杂需求的人。结果措施是根据为评估失去其他成年人患病的成年人的丧亲保护的核心结果而综合。包括来自26家医院31个ICU的ICU丧亲丧亲介入的三项研究。一项试验检查家庭存在对脑死亡评估的影响综合所有三类支持,但没有报告情绪或心理困扰的显着改善。另外两项试验评估了慰问的字母干预,这并没有减少悲伤症状,并且可能增加抑郁症和创伤后的症状,以及讲究的干预,发现焦虑,抑郁,创伤后应力或复杂无显着改善。或复杂悲伤。在随访中没有评估九个核心丧亲结果中的四个。目前可用的试验证据稀少,不支持在ICU中死亡的危重病人的非正式护理人员使用丧亲性干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号