首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >How do specialist surgeons treat the atrophic tooth gap? A vignette-based study among maxillofacial and oral surgeons
【24h】

How do specialist surgeons treat the atrophic tooth gap? A vignette-based study among maxillofacial and oral surgeons

机译:专家外科医生如何治疗萎缩牙齿差距? 基于小插图的颌面和口腔外科医生的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

There is little information available regarding the decision-making process of clinicians, especially in the choice of therapy for a severely atrophic tooth gap. The aim of this research was to use case vignettes to determine the influence of possible factors on the decision making of maxillofacial and oral surgeons. A total of 250 maxillofacial (MFS) and oral (OS) surgeons in southern Germany were surveyed for atrophic single- or multiple-tooth gap with the help of case vignettes. The influence of different determinants on the therapy decision was investigated. Two case vignettes were designed for this purpose: vignette 1 with determinants “patient age” and “endocarditis prophylaxis” and vignette 2 with determinants “anxiety” and “bisphosphonate therapy”. Furthermore, the specialist designation was assessed for both. The options available to achieve a sufficient implant site were "bone split", "bone block", "augmentation with bone substitute material" and "bone resection". Therapy was either recommended or rejected based on principle. A total of 117 participants returned the questionnaire: 68 (58%) were OS and 49 (42%) MFS. “Patient age” and “patient anxiety” were not significantly associated with any therapy decision. However, required “endocarditis prophylaxis” led to significantly higher refusal rates for "bone split", "bone block" and "bone replacement material" and to higher rates of general refusal of a therapy. “Bisphosphonate therapy” was significantly associated with general refusal of therapy, but with no significant correlation with different therapy options. In vignette 1, OS refused therapy significantly more often than MFS, though there was no association with the specialist designation for other therapy modalities. In vignette 2, specialty was not significantly associated with the therapy decision. “Patient age” as well as “patient anxiety” appear to have no or little influence on the treatment decision for severely atrophic single- or multiple-tooth gap by specialist surgeons. Surgeons more often refuse treatment for patients with endocarditis prophylaxis and bisphosphonate therapy.
机译:有关临床医生的决策过程的信息很少,特别是在治疗方面的临床治疗方面是严重萎缩的牙齿间隙。本研究的目的是使用案例羽毛,以确定可能因素对颌面和口腔外科医生的决策的影响。在壳体羽毛部门的帮助下,南德州南部的250名颌面内(MFS)和口服(OS)外科医生被调查萎缩,或多齿差。研究了不同决定因素对治疗决策的影响。为此目的设计了两种情况:小插图1具有决定因素的“患者年龄”和“心内膜炎预防”和具有决定因素“焦虑”和“双膦酸盐疗法”的小插图2。此外,专家指定评估两者。可用于实现足够植入部位的选项是“骨分裂”,“骨块”,“与骨替代材料的增强”和“骨切除”。基于原则,建议或拒绝治疗。共有117名参与者返回问卷:68(58%)是​​OS,49(42%)MFS。 “患者年龄”和“患者焦虑”与任何治疗决策没有显着相关。然而,所需的“心内膜炎预防”导致“骨分裂”,“骨块”和“骨置换材料”的拒绝率显着较高,并达到治疗的一般拒绝率。 “双膦酸盐疗法”与综合拒绝治疗显着相关,但与不同的治疗方案无明显相关。在小插图1中,OS拒绝疗法比MFS更频繁,尽管与其他治疗方式的专家指定没有相关性。在小插图2中,特种与治疗决策没有显着相关。 “患者年龄”以及“患者焦虑”似乎对通过专家外科医生严重萎缩的单牙或多齿差的治疗决定没有任何影响。外科医生更常常拒绝治疗心内膜炎预防和双膦酸盐治疗的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号