The Patient’s Denture Assessment (Thai version) is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the outcome of treatment with complete denture

摘要

Complete tooth losses are still being major problems which resulted in lesser quality of life especially for elderly patients. However, there are still lack of questionnaire to evaluate the treatment outcome from the patient’s aspect. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Patient’s Denture Assessment-Thai version (PDA-T), then use this questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with complete denture treatment outcome also investigates the factors involving their satisfaction. The subjects comprised 120 edentulous adult patients (49 men/71 women; average age 70?years-old) from the Prosthodontic and the Geriatric Dentistry and Special Patients Care Clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University during 2019 March?2020 March. The patients were divided into two groups: the group experienced (Exper) (n?=?54) with wearing complete dentures, and the non-experienced (NonExper) group (n?=?66). The patients used the validated PDA-T to self-assess their treatment at different times. The Exper group completed the questionnaire at t0 (during treatment), t0.5 (2?8-weeks after t0), and t1 (final follow-up). The NonExper group completed the questionnaire only at t1. In the Exper group, Cronbach’s α and average inter-item correlation was 0.95 (range 0.76?0.95) and 0.47 (range 0.57?0.83), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (n?=?18, 95% confidence interval) were 0.98 overall. The paired t-test (p??0.05) between t0 and t1 indicated a significant difference between t0 and t1 in every PDA-T topic, and the effect size was 1.71. In the NonExper group, the Pearson correlation analysis indicated no significant correlation between the patients' demographics and masticatory function. The reliability and validity of the PDA-T indicate it is a valuable tool for evaluating complete denture treatment. Treatment success affected the patients' satisfaction but was not associated with the type of doctors, genders, ages, or educational level.