首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): An umbrella review
【24h】

Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): An umbrella review

机译:哪些公共卫生干预措施有效地降低了低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)中儿童传染病的发病率,死亡率和健康不等式:伞审查

获取原文
       

摘要

Despite significant progress in the last few decades, infectious diseases remain a major threat to child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)—particularly amongst more disadvantaged groups. It is imperative to understand the best available evidence concerning which public health interventions reduce morbidity, mortality and health inequalities in children aged under five years. To address this gap, we carried out an umbrella review (a systematic reviews of reviews) to identify evidence on the effects of public health interventions (promotion, protection, prevention) on morbidity, mortality and/or health inequalities due to infectious diseases amongst children in LMICs. Ten databases were searched for records published between 2014–2021 alongside a manual search of gray literature. Articles were quality-assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR 2). A narrative synthesis was conducted. We identified 60 systematic reviews synthesizing 453 individual primary studies. A majority of the reviews reported on preventive interventions (n = 48), with a minority on promotion (n = 17) and almost no reviews covering health protection interventions (n = 2). Effective interventions for improving child health across the whole population, as well as the most disadvantaged included communication, education and social mobilization for specific preventive services or tools, such as immunization or bed nets. For all other interventions, the effects were either unclear, unknown or detrimental, either at the overall population level or regarding health inequalities. We found few reviews reporting health inequalities information and the quality of the evidence base was generally low. Our umbrella review identified some prevention interventions that might be useful in reducing under five mortality from infectious diseases in LMICs, particularly amongst the most disadvantaged groups.
机译:尽管在过去的几十年中取得了重大进展,但传染病仍然是对低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)儿童健康的主要威胁 - 在更弱势群体中,尤其是持续的群体。必须了解有关公共卫生干预的最佳证据,这是公共卫生干预措施降低五年儿童的发病率,死亡率和健康不平等的最佳证据。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了伞审查(对评论的系统审查),以确定由于儿童传染病因感染性疾病而对发病率,死亡率和/或健康不平等的影响有关的证据在lmics中。在2014-2021之间的记录以及手动搜索灰色文献中,搜索了十个数据库。使用多种系统评论工具(AMSTAR 2)评估质量评估文章。进行叙事合成。我们确定了60个系统评论,合成453个个人初级研究。关于预防性干预措施(n = 48)报告的大多数评论,促销少数群体(n = 17),几乎没有涉及卫生保护干预的评论(n = 2)。在整个人口中改善儿童健康的有效干预措施,以及最弱势群体包括针对特定预防性服务或工具的通信,教育和社会动员,如免疫或卧床。对于所有其他干预措施,效果不明确,未知或不利,无论是在整体人口水平还是关于健康不平等。我们发现据报道报告报告健康不等式信息和证据基础的质量一般很低。我们的伞综述确定了一些预防干预措施,可用于减少液化物质传染病的五个死亡率,特别是在最弱势群体中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号