首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Evaluating the antidiabetic effects of R-verapamil in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus mouse models
【24h】

Evaluating the antidiabetic effects of R-verapamil in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus mouse models

机译:评估R-Verapamil在1型和2型糖尿病小鼠模型中的抗糖尿病效应

获取原文
           

摘要

The global incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing. Types 1 and 2 DM are associated with declining β-cell function. Verapamil (50% S-verapamil and 50% R-verapamil) can treat DM by downregulating thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), which induces islet β-cell apoptosis. However, it may also induce cardiovascular side effects as S-verapamil is negatively inotropic. In contrast, R-verapamil only weakly induces adverse cardiac effects. In this study, we aimed to determine the antidiabetic efficacy and cardiovascular safety of R-verapamil. We examined R- and S-verapamil binding through in vitro studies. Streptozotocin-induced type 1 and db / db type 2 DM mouse models were used to assess the antidiabetic efficacy of verapamil. IL-6, blood glucose (BG), Txnip expression, and β-cells were evaluated in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, while body weight, BG, and serum insulin were measured in the db / db mice. In the type 1 DM study, 100 mg/kg/day R-verapamil and racemic verapamil lowered BG, downregulated Txnip expression, and reduced β-cell apoptosis. In the type 2 DM study, the optimal R-verapamil dosage was 60 mg/kg/day and it lowered BG and raised serum insulin. However, efficacy did not increase with R-verapamil dosage. R-verapamil combined with metformin/acarbose improved BG and serum insulin more effectively than metformin/acarbose alone or verapamil combined with acarbose. R-verapamil had weaker cardiovascular side effects than S-verapamil. R-verapamil was 9.0× and 3.4× less effective than S-verapamil at inhibiting atrial inotropy and ileal contractility, respectively. It was also 8.7× weaker than S-verapamil as an agonist of somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), inhibiting ileal neurogenic contraction. Hence, R-verapamil may be an optimal DM treatment as it is safe, improves glycemic control, and preserves β-cell function both as monotherapy and in combination with metformin or acarbose. R-Verapamil has potential for delaying or arresting DM progression and improving patients’ quality of life.
机译:糖尿病(DM)的全球发病率越来越多。类型1和2 DM与β-细胞功能下降相关。维拉帕米(50%S-VERAPAMIL和50%R-VERAPAMIL)可以通过下调硫化毒素相互作用蛋白(TXNIP)来治疗DM,其诱导胰岛β细胞凋亡。然而,它也可能诱导心血管副作用,因为S-verapamil是负的肌室。相比之下,R-verapamil只是弱诱导不良心脏效应。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定R-Verapamil的抗糖尿病疗效和心血管安全性。我们通过体外研究检查了R-和S-VERAPAMIL结合。链脲佐菌素诱导的1型和DB / DB型DM小鼠模型用于评估维拉帕米的抗糖尿病疗效。在链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病小鼠中评估IL-6,血糖(BG),TXNIP表达和β-细胞,而在DB / DB小鼠中测量体重,Bg和血清胰岛素。在1型DM研究中,100mg / kg /天r-verapamil和外消旋维拉帕米降低Bg,下调的Txnip表达和降低的β细胞凋亡。在2型DM研究中,最佳R-Verapamil剂量为60mg / kg /天,降低Bg并升高血清胰岛素。然而,使用R-Verapamil剂量没有增加疗效。 R-Verapamil与二甲双胍/氨基糖相结合的Bg和血清胰岛素比单独的二甲双胍/氨基糖或维拉帕米与acarbose结合。 R-Verapamil的心血管副作用较弱,而不是S-Verapamil。 R-Verapamil分别在抑制心房尿路和髂骨收缩性时比S-Verapamil效率为9.0×和3.4倍。它也比S-Verapamil弱8.7倍,作为生长抑素受体类型2(SSTR2)的激动剂,抑制髂骨神经源性收缩。因此,R-verapamil可以是最佳的DM处理,因为它是安全的,改善血糖控制,并将β细胞功能保持为单疗法和与二甲双胍或acarbose组合。 R-Verapamil有可能延迟或逮捕DM进展,提高患者的生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号