...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Systematic scoping review of the concept of ‘genetic identity’ and its relevance for germline modification
【24h】

Systematic scoping review of the concept of ‘genetic identity’ and its relevance for germline modification

机译:“遗传认同”概念的系统范围综述及其对种系改性的相关性

获取原文
           

摘要

EU legislation prohibits clinical trials that modify germ line ‘genetic identity’. ‘Genetic identity’ however, is left undefined. This study aims to identify the use of the term ‘genetic identity’ in academic literature, and investigate its relevance for debates on genetic modification. A total of 616 articles that contained the term were identified. Content analysis revealed that the term was used in various and contradicting ways and a clear understanding of the term is lacking. This review demonstrates that the EU legislation is open to interpretation, because of the diversity of meaning with which ‘genetic identity’ is currently used. Because of the diversity of meaning with which ‘genetic identity’ is used and understood, further reflection is needed. This requires further medical, legal, ethical and social debate and a coordinated response at both a European and a global level.
机译:欧盟立法禁止临床试验,以修改细菌系列“遗传身份”。 然而,“遗传身份”是未定义的。 本研究旨在确定学术文献中“遗传身份”一词的使用,并调查其对遗传修改辩论的相关性。 确定了616条包含该术语的文章。 内容分析表明,缺乏各种各样的方式和矛盾的方式,缺乏对术语的清晰理解。 该审查表明,由于目前使用“遗传标识”的意义的多样性,欧盟立法是开放的解释。 由于使用并理解了“遗传标识”的含义的多样性,因此需要进一步的反射。 这需要进一步的医疗,法律,道德和社会辩论以及欧洲和全球层面的协调响应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号