首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Does Postmodernism Really Entail a Disregard for the Truth? Similarities and Differences in Postmodern and Critical Rationalist Conceptualizations of Truth, Progress, and Empirical Research Methods
【24h】

Does Postmodernism Really Entail a Disregard for the Truth? Similarities and Differences in Postmodern and Critical Rationalist Conceptualizations of Truth, Progress, and Empirical Research Methods

机译:后现代主义真的需要忽略真相吗? 后现代和批判性理性主义概念化的相似性和差异,进展和经验研究方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Within this article, I will compare postmodernist and critical rationalist conceptualizations of epistemological key concepts such as truth, progress, and research methods. An analysis of Gergen’s program for a postmodern psychology shows that a na?ve positivist understanding of truth is clearly incompatible with his postmodernist approach, whereas a correctly understood falsificationist use of truth as a guiding ideal may not be. However, postmodernists are often content with a diversity of voices as the endpoint of scientific activities, whereas critical rationalists such as Popper would put more emphasis on attempts to reach a common understanding. The differences between critical rationalists such as Popper and Deutsch and postmodernists such as Gergen are more complicated when it comes to conceptualizations of progress: whereas, postmodernists do not deny the existence of some forms of progress such as technological innovation, they argue that the modernist grand narrative, which views Western culture and the corresponding technological revolutions as being equal to epistemological progress and societal and political progress per se , has become untenable. Debates on possible negative consequences of modern technology are one example of evidence for this. Here, critical rationalists tend to engage in a legitimization discourse, sensu Lyotard, and to defend Western culture with all its deficiencies as a necessary precondition for evolutionary epistemic as well as societal and political progress, although they would agree with large parts of the postmodern critique of modernism. Postmodernists and critical rationalists would both agree that psychology as a field would benefit greatly, among other things, from a transition from a methods-oriented approach to scientific knowledge to a more problem-oriented approach, and from less methodological dogmatism. Taken together, postmodernism and critical rationalism may not be as irreconcilable as it may seem at first glance.
机译:在本文中,我将比较后现代主义者和关键理性主义概念概念化,如真理,进展和研究方法。对Gergen的后现代心理学计划的分析表明,NA?ve实证的对真理的理解与他的后现代方法显然不相容,而正确理解的伪造案例使用真相可能不是指导理想。然而,后现代主义者通常是具有多样性的声音作为科学活动的终点,而Popper等批判性理性主义者将更加重视达成共同理解的尝试。当涉及进步的概念化方面,诸如Gergen等统计理性主义者(如Gergen)(如Gergen)之间的差异观念西方文化和相应的技术革命等同于认识论进步和社会和政治进度本身的相应技术革命变得无法理解。关于现代技术可能的负面后果的辩论是这证据的一个例子。在这里,关键的理性主义者倾向于从事合法化话语,Sensu Lyotard,并以其所有缺陷为捍卫西方文化,作为进化认知和社会和政治进步的必要先决条件,尽管他们会同意后现代批评的大部分批评现代主义。后现代主义者和关键的理性主义者都同意,作为一个领域的心理学将在其他方面受益于从一种以方法为导向的方法的转型来对待更具责任的方法,以及较少的方法论教条。连同,后现代主义和批判性理性主义可能不会像乍一看那样不可调和。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号