首页> 外文期刊>Duke environmental law & policy forum >The Environmental Protection Agency’s Role in U.S. Climate Policy- A Fifty Year Appraisal
【24h】

The Environmental Protection Agency’s Role in U.S. Climate Policy- A Fifty Year Appraisal

机译:环境保护局在美国气候政策中的作用 - 五十年的评估

获取原文
           

摘要

In 1983, the little-known “Strategic Studies” staff, within the somewhat obscure Office of Policy Analysis in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), released—at no one’s request—a report entitled Can We Delay a Greenhouse Warming? The report summarized the results of the most current atmospheric temperature and carbon cycle models,1 which showed that due to rising atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, global average temperatures could increase by 2 degrees Celsius by the middle of the twenty-first century. This temperature rise, it said, would “likely” be accompanied by “dramatic changes in precipitation and storm patterns and a rise in global average sea levels,” significantly altering agriculture, disrupting environmental and economic conditions, and stressing political institutions.2 The study went on to explore various strategies to slow or limit warming, including some policies that, in retrospect, seem eye-popping for EPA to even have considered internally, let alone discuss in a public report, including a 300% tax on fossil fuels and a ban on both coal and shale oil.
机译:1983年,鲜为人知的“战略研究”工作人员,内部难以置疑的政策分析办公室在美国环境保护局(EPA),发布 - 在没有人的要求 - 题为我们可以推迟温室变暖的报告吗?该报告总结了最电流大气温度和碳循环模型的结果,其中1显示,由于大气浓度上升的二氧化碳浓度上升,全球平均气温可能在二十一世纪中叶增加2摄氏度。它表示,这种温度升起,“可能”伴随着“降水和风暴模式的巨大变化,全球平均海平面上升,”显着改变农业,扰乱环境和经济条件,并强调政治机构。这项研究继续探索各种策略,缓慢或限制变暖,包括一些政策,即在回想起来,似乎对环保署迄今为止被审议的ePA似乎普遍存在,更不用说在公共报告中讨论,其中包括300%的化石燃料税,包括300%禁止煤炭和页岩油。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号