首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >An engaged approach to exploring issues around poverty and mental health: A reflective evaluation of the research process from researchers and community partners involved in the DeStress study
【24h】

An engaged approach to exploring issues around poverty and mental health: A reflective evaluation of the research process from researchers and community partners involved in the DeStress study

机译:探索贫困和心理健康问题的一项从事途径:反思评估研究人员和社区合作伙伴参与的研究流程

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Involving patients, service users, carers and members of the public in research has been part of health policy and practice in the UK for the last 15?years. However, low‐income communities tend to remain marginalized from the co‐design and delivery of mental health research, perpetuating the potential for health inequalities. Greater understanding is therefore needed on how to meaningfully engage low‐income communities in mental health research. Objectives To explore and articulate whether and how an engaged research approach facilitated knowledge coproduction relating to poverty and mental distress. Setting A reflective evaluation of community and researcher engagement in the DeStress?study that took place in two low‐income areas of South‐west England. Design Reflective evaluation by the authors through on‐going feedback, a focus group and first‐person writing and discussion on experiences of working with the DeStress?project, and how knowledge coproduction was influenced by an engaged research approach. Results An engaged research approach influenced the process and delivery of the DeStress?project, creating a space where community partners felt empowered to coproduce knowledge relating to poverty‐related mental distress, treatment and the training of health professionals that would otherwise have been missed. We examine motivations for involvement, factors sustaining engagement, how coproduction influenced research analysis, findings and dissemination of outputs, and what involvement meant for different stakeholders. Conclusion Engaged research supported the coproduction of knowledge in mental health research with low‐income communities which led to multiple impacts.
机译:背景技术涉及患者,服务用户,护理人员和公众在研究中的成员是英国过去15年的卫生政策和实践的一部分。然而,低收入社区往往与精神卫生研究的共同设计和交付仍然被边缘化,这延续了健康不平等的潜力。因此,如何在精神卫生研究中有意义地参与低收入社区需要更大的理解。探索和清楚的目标是否以及如何以及如何促进与贫困和精神痛苦有关的知识副化。在Dessress中制定社区和研究人员参与的反思评估?在英格兰西南两次低收入地区进行的研究。通过持续反馈,焦点小组和第一人称写作和讨论作者的反思评估,以及关于与去球场合作的经验?项目,以及知识委员会如何受到从事研究方法的影响。结果从事研究方法影响了去年的流程和交付?项目,创造了一个社区合作伙伴的空间,旨在使与贫困有关的精神痛苦,治疗和对卫生专业人士的培训进行群体,否则将被遗弃。我们研究涉及的动机,维持参与的因素,如何影响产出的研究分析,调查结果以及传播的研究,以及不同利益相关者的意义。结论从事研究支持与低收入社区的心理健康研究中的知识副本,导致多次影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号