...
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Pathogens >SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNβ production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon
【24h】

SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNβ production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon

机译:SARS-COV-2抑制NSP1,5,6,15,ORF6和ORF7B介导的IFNβ生产,但不抑制添加干扰素的效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Type I Interferons (IFN-Is) are a family of cytokines which play a major role in inhibiting viral infection. Resultantly, many viruses have evolved mechanisms in which to evade the IFN-I response. Here we tested the impact of expression of 27 different SARS-CoV-2 genes in relation to their effect on IFN production and activity using three independent experimental methods. We identified six gene products; NSP6, ORF6, ORF7b, NSP1, NSP5 and NSP15, which strongly (10-fold) blocked MAVS-induced (but not TRIF-induced) IFNβ production. Expression of the first three of these SARS-CoV-2 genes specifically blocked MAVS-induced IFNβ-promoter activity, whereas all six genes induced a collapse in IFNβ mRNA levels, corresponding with suppressed IFNβ protein secretion. Five of these six genes furthermore suppressed MAVS-induced activation of IFNλs, however with no effect on IFNα or IFNγ production. In sharp contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infected cells remained extremely sensitive to anti-viral activity exerted by added IFN-Is. None of the SARS-CoV-2 genes were able to block IFN-I signaling, as demonstrated by robust activation of Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISGs) by added interferon. This, despite the reduced levels of STAT1 and phospho-STAT1, was likely caused by broad translation inhibition mediated by NSP1. Finally, we found that a truncated ORF7b variant that has arisen from a mutant SARS-CoV-2 strain harboring a 382-nucleotide deletion associating with mild disease (Δ382 strain identified in Singapore & Taiwan in 2020) lost its ability to suppress type I and type III IFN production. In summary, our findings support a multi-gene process in which SARS-CoV-2 blocks IFN-production, with ORF7b as a major player, presumably facilitating evasion of host detection during early infection. However, SARS-CoV-2 fails to suppress IFN-I signaling thus providing an opportunity to exploit IFN-Is as potential therapeutic antiviral drugs.
机译:I型干扰素(IFN-IS)是一种在抑制病毒感染方面发挥着重要作用的细胞因子。结果,许多病毒具有进化的机制,用于避开IFN-I的反应。在这里,我们通过三种独立实验方法测试了27种不同SARS-COV-2基因的表达对IFN生产和活性的影响。我们确定了六种基因产品; NSP6,ORF6,ORF7B,NSP1,NSP5和NSP15强烈(& 10倍)阻塞了MAVS诱导的(但不是TRIF-诱导的)IFNβ生产。这些SAR-COV-2基因中的前三种的表达特异性地阻断了MAVS诱导的IFNβ-启动子活性,而所有六个基因诱导IFNβmRNA水平塌陷,相应于抑制IFNβ蛋白质分泌。这些六个基因中的五种进一步抑制了IFNλs的MAVS诱导的IFNλ的活化,但没有对IFNα或IFNγ产生的影响。在鲜明的对比中,SARS-COV-2感染的细胞对由添加的IFN的添加施加的抗病毒活性保持极敏感。没有一个SARS-COV-2基因能够阻止IFN-I信号传导,如通过添加的干扰素的稳健激活干扰素刺激基因(ISG)所证明的。这尽管STAT1和磷酸-TAT1的水平降低,但是由NSP1介导的广泛翻译抑制可能导致。最后,我们发现,从含有382核苷酸缺失的突变体SARS-COV-2菌株中出现的截短的ORF7B变体涉及与轻度疾病相关的382核苷酸缺失(在2020年在新加坡和台湾确定的Δ382菌株)失去了抑制I和II型IFN生产。总之,我们的研究结果支持一种多基因过程,其中SARS-COV-2阻断IFN-生产,用ORF7B作为主要参与者,可能促进早期感染期间宿主检测的逃避。然而,SARS-COV-2未能抑制IFN-I信令,从而提供利用IFN的机会 - 是潜在的治疗抗病毒药物。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号