...
首页> 外文期刊>Science, Technology & Public Policy >The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples' National Regional State
【24h】

The Practice and Challenges of Regional Policy Making in Ethiopian Federation: The Case of Gambela Peoples' National Regional State

机译:埃塞俄比亚联邦区域政策制定的实践与挑战:甘地国家国家地区国家的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study is to assess the practice of public policy making (agenda setting-policy adoption) in Gambela National Regional State, Ethiopia. To this end, the study utilized a mixed research approach and descriptive research design. The study found that the legal foundations of public policymaking of GPNRS include the constitution of FDRE (1995), the revised constitution of GPNRS (2002). Moreover, the administrative council of GPNRS and the ruling political party of GPNRS are the constitutionally mandated public policy actors and structures in GPNRS are the council of GPNRS. Though the constitutional guarantee for autonomous regional public policy making, in practice few central policy elites of EPRDF have played an exclusive role in defining and identifying policy problems and setting policy agenda. Whereas the legislature and the executive organs of GPNRS, under the strict control of the regional state's ruling party remained to be platforms of policy formulation and adoption. Thereby study found that the practice of regional policy making failed to realize the exercise of the constitutional right of regional public policy making; and hence the constitutional promise of self-rule in GPNRS. The study has also found that: the political ideology of revolutionary democracy and decision making system of 'democratic centralism' and 'party discipline'; the intermingling of the ruling party institutions and government institutions; Lower public participation; in-competency of policy makers and lack policy analysis unit; a fusion of power between the executive and legislative organ; and the asymmetric nature of Ethiopian federalism has also posed challenge in undermining the exercise of the constitutional promise of regional policy making; and hence self-rule in GPNRS. Hence it is recommended that deepening democratization, promoting decentralization of decision-making system, avoiding the intermingling of political party and government, establishing policy analysis units and building the policy making capacity of regional policy makers to realize the constitutional promise of regional public policy making in GPNRS.
机译:本研究的目的是评估埃塞俄比亚驻埃塞俄比亚全国区域地区公共政策制定(议程设定政策采用)的实践。为此,该研究利用了混合研究方法和描述性研究设计。该研究发现,GPNR的公共政策制定的法律基础包括FDRE(1995)的宪法,修订了GPNRS(2002)。此外,GPNR的管理理事会和GPNR的执政党政党是宪法授权的公共政策行为者和GPNR的结构是GPNR的理事会。虽然自主区域公共政策制定的宪法保障,但在实践中少数EPRDF的中央政策精英在定义和识别政策问题和制定政策议程方面发挥了独特的作用。虽然立法机关和GPNR的行政机关,但在严格控制区域国家执政党仍然是政策制定和通过的平台。因此,研究发现,区域政策制定的实践未能实现区域公共政策制定的宪法权利;因此,GPNR中自我规则的宪法承诺。该研究还发现:革命民主的政治意识形态和“民主集中制”和“党纪律”的决策制度;执政党机构和政府机构的混合;降低公众参与;政策制定者的能力和缺乏政策分析单位;执行和立法器官之间的权力融合;而埃塞俄比亚联邦主义的不对称性也在破坏区域政策制定的宪法承诺时提出了挑战;因此,在GPNR中的自我规则。因此,建议深化民主化,促进决策制度的权力下放,避免了政党和政府的混合,建立政策分析单位,建立区域政策制定者的政策能力,以实现区域公共政策的宪法承诺GPNRS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号