...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >“Double-Pulley” Dual-Row Technique for Arthroscopic Fixation of Large Bony Bankart Lesion: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up With CT Evaluation
【24h】

“Double-Pulley” Dual-Row Technique for Arthroscopic Fixation of Large Bony Bankart Lesion: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up With CT Evaluation

机译:“双轮”对大骨架的关节镜固定的双排技术:CT评价最低2年后续随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: A “double-pulley” dual-row technique had been applied for arthroscopic fixation of large bony Bankart lesion in which the?fragment has a wide base. Purpose: To investigate clinical outcomes and glenoid healing after arthroscopic fixation of bony Bankart lesion?using the double-pulley dual-row technique. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 25 patients were included in this retrospective study. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, and range of motion of the affected shoulder were assessed. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans (preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at 1 year postoperatively) were performed to evaluate arthritic changes (Samilson-Prieto classification) and glenoid size. The intraobserver reliability of the CT measurements was analyzed. Results: At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, the mean ASES and VAS scores were 94.87 ± 5.02 and 0.48 ± 0.59, respectively. Active forward elevation, external rotation with the arm at the side, and internal rotation were 165.80° ± 11.70°, 33.20° ± 8.02°, and T9 (range, T6-S1), respectively. No patient reported a history of redislocation or instability. The intraobserver reliability of the CT measurements was moderate to excellent. The mean preoperative size of the bony fragment was measured as 23.4% ± 7.8% of the glenoid articular surface. The quality of the reduction was judged to be excellent in 13 (52%) cases, good in 8 (32%), and fair in 4 (16%). The mean immediate postoperative glenoid size was 96.8% ± 4.3%, and bone union was found in all cases. There were no significant differences between reconstructed and immediate postoperative glenoid size or between preoperative and final Samilson-Prieto grades. Conclusion: The arthroscopic double-pulley method was a reliable technique for the fixation of large bony Bankart lesions with a wide base. Satisfactory results can be expected regarding the restoration of the glenoid morphology and stability of the shoulder. High healing rate and good shoulder function can be achieved. No radiological evidence of cartilage damage caused by suture abrasion was found at 2- to 5-year follow-up.
机译:背景:“双轮”双排技术已应用于大骨架损伤的关节镜固定,其中α片段具有宽底座。目的:在关节镜固定后探讨骨吸孔病变后的临床结果和关节盂愈合吗?使用双轮双排技术。研究设计:案例系列;证据水平,4.方法:在这项回顾性研究中共有25名患者。评估美国肩部和肘部外科医生(ASES)得分,疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分以及受影响肩部的运动范围。进行射线照相和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描(术前,手术后立即,术后,术后1年)进行评估关节炎变化(Samilson-Prieto分类)和胶质素尺寸。分析了CT测量的垄断服务器可靠性。结果:平均随访3.4岁,平均分量和VAS分别分别为94.87±5.02和0.48±0.59。主动前进高程,侧面的外部旋转,内部旋转分别为165.80°±11.70°,33.20°±8.02°和T9(范围,T6-S1)。没有患者报告了重新分配或不稳定的历史。 CT测量的垄断可靠性是适中的。骨片段的平均术前尺寸测量为胶质盒关节表面的23.4%±7.8%。减少的质量被判断为优异的13例(52%)病例,良好8(32%),4(16%)公平。平均直接术后关节盂尺寸为96.8%±4.3%,并且在所有情况下都会发现骨髓。重建和立即术后关节盂大小或术前和最终的Samils-Prieto等级之间没有显着差异。结论:关节镜双皮带轮方法是一种可靠的技术,用于固定大骨架的宽底座。可以预期令人满意的结果,关于肩部的关节形态和肩部稳定性的恢复。可以实现高愈合率和良好的肩部功能。没有由缝合磨损造成的软骨损伤的放射性证据在2至5年的随访中发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号