...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Comparison Between Early and Late Retensioning of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device During Hamstring ACL Reconstruction
【24h】

Comparison Between Early and Late Retensioning of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device During Hamstring ACL Reconstruction

机译:调节环皮质悬架装置在腿筋ACL重建期间的早期和晚期退休性的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background: Biomechanical studies have demonstrated significant loosening of the adjustable-loop device as compared with the fixed-loop device used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Retensioning of the adjustable loop has been recommended; however, the timing of the retensioning is unknown. Hypothesis: Early (ER) and late retensioning (LR) will show similar gapping between the femoral tunnel and graft on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and similar clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 101 patients who underwent hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the adjustable-loop device for femoral fixation between June 2016 and January 2018. All patients a had follow-up MRI on postoperative day 1. Patients with revision surgery and those with reinjury after reconstruction were excluded. In the ER group, retensioning and knot tying of the initially tightened adjustable loop were performed after the flip of the button and before the graft was fixed at the tibia. In the LR group, retensioning and knot tying were performed after initial tightening of the adjustable loop and graft fixation at the tibial side. The tunnel-graft gap measured on multiplanar reformatted images of MRI scans was compared between the groups, as were clinical outcomes. Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 30.3 years (range, 14-61 years). ER and knot tying were performed in 56 patients and LR and knot tying in 45. Preoperative characteristics of the 2 groups showed no significant differences. The mean ± SD tunnel-graft gap was 1.5 ± 2.0 mm in the ER group and 5.4 ± 4.0 mm in the LR group ( P & .001). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups. Conclusion: ER and knot tying demonstrated less tunnel-graft gap than that of LR. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes according to the timing of retensioning.
机译:背景:与前十字韧带重建中使用的固定环装置相比,生物力学研究表明可调节环装置的显着松动。推荐了可调节环的退休性;然而,退休性的时序未知。假设:早(ER)和晚期退休度(LR)将显示股骨隧道和移植物之间的类似弹跳在随访磁共振成像(MRI)和类似的临床结果上。研究设计:队列研究;证据级别,3.方法:本研究包括使用可调节回路装置的101例接受腿筋前十字韧带重建的患者,用于2016年6月至2018年1月。所有患者在术后第1天有后续MRI。患者随着修复手术和重建后重新评估的人。在ER组中,在按钮的翻转之后和在胫骨上固定在胫骨之前,在初始紧固的可调节环中捆绑最初紧固的可调节环。在LR组中,在初始紧固可调节环和胫骨侧的移植物固定之后进行退休性和结。在临床结果之间比较了对MRI扫描的多平坦重新扫描图像测量的隧道移植差距,如临床结果。结果:手术时患者的平均年龄为30.3岁(范围,14-61岁)。在56名患者和LR和结45患者中进行ER和结捆绑,并在45中捆绑。2组的术前特征显示没有显着差异。在ER组中平均值±SD隧道移植间隙为1.5±2.0 mm,在LR组中为5.4±4.0mm(P& .001)。组之间的临床结果没有显着差异。结论:ER和结捆绑展示较少的隧道移植隙而不是LR。然而,根据退休性时序的临床结果没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号