...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Clinical Outcomes of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Combined With Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
【24h】

Clinical Outcomes of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Combined With Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

机译:前外韧带重建或横向关节术的临床结果与初级ACL重建联合:Meta分析系统审查

获取原文

摘要

Background: Residual rotational instability after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been a challenge for many years. Anterolateral extra-articular procedures (AEAPs), including anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), are performed as a surgical option for additional rotational stability, but clear evidence for their usefulness is lacking. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature regarding the efficacy of AEAP in primary ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in April 2020, following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 3444 studies were screened, and 20 studies (11 randomized controlled trials and 9 nonrandomized studies) were evaluated. Functional outcomes, stability, and complications were compared between patients who underwent primary ACLR with AEAP and those who underwent isolated primary ACLR. For subgroup analysis, outcomes were compared according to AEAP technique (ALLR vs LET) and time from injury to surgery (≤12 vs &12 months). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, Jadad scale, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Compared with isolated ACLR, combined ACLR with AEAP led to improved pivot-shift grades and graft failure rates, regardless of the AEAP technique or of time from injury to surgery. A limited, marginal improvement in subjective function score was observed in patients who underwent AEAP combined with ACLR. In contrast to ALLR, patients who underwent LET combined with ACLR had an increased risk of knee stiffness and adverse events. Conclusion: Our review suggests that when there is a need to improve rotational stability and subjective function, AEAP combined with primary ACLR can be considered regardless of time from injury. ALLR appeared to be a better option for improving rotational stability compared with LET.
机译:背景:孤立的旋转不稳定性孤立的旋转韧带重建(ACLR)多年来一直是挑战。前外关节手术(AEAP)(包括前韧带重建(ALLR)或横向特性的特性(Let),作为额外的旋转稳定性的手术选择,但缺乏明确的证据。目的:进行关于AEAP在原发性ACLR中AEAP疗效的文献进行系统审查和荟萃分析。研究设计:系统评论;证据水平,3.方法:由2名独立审查员进行文献搜索,数据提取和质量评估。在2020年4月,在PRISMA之后搜索了Medline,Embase和Cochrane图书馆(用于系统评价和Meta-Analyses的首选报告项目)指导方针。筛查总共3444项研究,评估了20项研究(11项随机对照试验和9项非扫描研究)。在接受AEAP的原发性ACLR的患者之间比较功能结果,稳定性和并发症,以及接受孤立的主要ACLR的患者。对于亚组分析,根据AEAP技术(Allr VS Let)和从伤害到手术的时间(≤12Vs& 12个月)进行比较。使用Cochrane偏倚工具,JADAD规模和纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模评估包括研究的方法论质量。结果:与分离的ACLR相比,与AEAP的组合ACLR导致枢轴转位和移植失效率,无论AEAP技术还是从伤害到手术的时间。在接受AEAP与ACLR结合的患者中观察到主观函数分数的有限的边缘改善。与Allr相比,接受与ACLR的患者患者膝关节刚度和不良事件的风险增加。结论:我们的评论表明,当需要改善旋转稳定性和主观功能时,无论从受伤时间内,都可以考虑与主要ACLR联合的AEAP。与让Let相比,Allr似乎是改善旋转稳定性的更好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号