首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Locally Produced Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer and Commonly Available Commercial Hand Sanitizer Used in Healthcare Facilities in Uganda
【24h】

Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Locally Produced Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer and Commonly Available Commercial Hand Sanitizer Used in Healthcare Facilities in Uganda

机译:乌干达医疗设施中常用的酒精洗手液和常用商用洗手液的抗菌疗效的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Use of hand sanitizers has become a cornerstone in clinical practice for the prevention of disease transmission between practitioners and patients. There are a number of hand sanitizers sold on the Ugandan market with labels on their packages that claim that the hand sanitizer can kill 99.999% of germs and also there are hospitals that embarked on the local production of alcohol based hand sanitizer whose efficacy data are not locally available. Objective: To evaluate antibacterial efficacy of locally produced alcohol based hand sanitizer and commonly available commercial hand sanitizer used in healthcare facilities in Uganda. Method: This was an in vitro experimental, laboratory-based study of two different brands of hand sanitizers commonly used in healthcare facilities in Uganda and these were compared to a reference standard 60% Isopropyl alcohol. Efficacy was evaluated using standard organisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 13883), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and S. aureus (ATCC 25923) as per prEN12054, a European standard method. The logarithmic and percentage reduction factors (RF) were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Results: Both hand sanitizers studied were able to reduce bacteria by more than 105-fold within 15 seconds. Efficacy was independent of the alcohol concentration in each brand (Saraya 70% and locally made 80% alcohol). Conclusion: All of the hand sanitizers assessed had efficacy that meets World Health Organization (WHO) and PrEN12054 standards. From this study we are in agreement with the use of the locally made hand sanitizer and Saraya. The two hand sanitizers had broad antibacterial spectrum. However, there is a need to evaluate efficacy and organoleptic properties using in vivo studies.
机译:手动消毒剂已经成为预防从业者和患者疾病传播的临床实践中的基石。在乌干达市场上销售了许多手持式消毒剂,并在他们的套餐上销售,声称手动消毒剂可以杀死99.999%的细菌,也有医院,这些医院可以探讨当地生产酒精的洗手消毒剂,其疗效数据不是当地可用。目的:评价乌干达医疗保健设施中局部生产的酒精洗手液和常用商业手浪器的抗菌疗效。方法:这是一种体外实验性的实验室,实验室研究了两种不同品牌的手动消毒剂,常用于乌干达的医疗保健设施,这些方法与参考标准60%异丙醇进行比较。使用Klebsiella Pneuboniae美国型培养物(ATCC 13883),大肠杆菌(ATCC 25922)和S.UUREUS(ATCC 25923)的标准生物评估疗效,如PREN12054,欧洲标准方法。在基线和治疗后评估对数和百分比减少因子(RF)。结果:两种手动消毒剂都能在15秒内减少105倍以上的细菌。功效与每个品牌中的酒精浓度无关(Saraya 70%和局部80%的酒精)。结论:评估的所有手动消毒剂都有符合世界卫生组织(WHO)和PREN12054标准的疗效。从本研究开始,我们与局部制作的手动消毒剂和萨拉纳的使用一致。两手消毒剂具有广泛的抗菌谱。然而,需要在体内研究中评估疗效和感官特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号