...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Surgery >Therapeutic Effect of Large Channel Endoscopic Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
【24h】

Therapeutic Effect of Large Channel Endoscopic Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

机译:大通道内镜减压在腰椎狭窄中的疗效

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic decompression (PED) is a minimally invasive surgical technique that is now used for not only disc herniation but also lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, few studies have reported endoscopic surgery for LSS. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the outcomes and safety of large channel endoscopic decompression. Methods: Forty-one patients diagnosed with LSS who underwent PED surgery were included in the study. The estimated blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, reoperations, complications, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and SF-36 physical-component summary scores were assessed. Preoperative and postoperative continuous data were compared through paired-samples t -tests. The significance level for all analyses was defined as p 0.05. Results: A total of 41 consecutive patients underwent PED, including 21 (51.2%) males and 20 (48.8%) females. The VAS and ODI scores decreased from preoperatively to postoperatively, but the JOA and SF-36 physical component summary scores significantly increased. The VAS (lumbar) score decreased from 5.05 ± 2.33 to 0.45 ± 0.71 ( P = 0.000); the VAS (leg) score decreased from 5.51 ± 2.82 to 0.53 ± 0.72 ( P = 0.000); the ODI score decreased from 52.80 ± 20.41 to 4.84 ± 3.98 ( P = 0.000), and the JOA score increased from 11.73 ± 4.99 to 25.32 ± 2.12 ( P = 0.000). Only 1 patient experienced an intraoperative complication (2.4%; dural tear), and 1 patient required reoperation (2.4%). Conclusions: Surgical treatment for LSS is to sufficiently decompress and minimize the trauma and complications caused by surgery. This study did not reveal any obvious shortcomings of PED and suggested PED is a safe and effective treatment for LSS.
机译:背景:经皮内窥镜减压(PED)是一种微创手术技术,现在不仅用于椎间盘突出症,而且是腰椎狭窄(LSS)。然而,很少有研究报告过LSS的内窥镜手术。因此,我们进行了本研究,以评估大通道内窥镜减压的结果和安全性。方法:诊断患有患有PED手术的LSS的四十一名患者被列入该研究。估计的血液损失,手术时间,住院时间,医院成本,重新进展,并发症,视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,oswestry残疾指数(ODI)得分,日本矫形协会(JOA)得分和SF-36物理组件摘要评分得到评估。通过配对样品T -Tests比较术前和术后连续数据。所有分析的显着性水平被定义为P& 0.05。结果:共连续41名患者接受PED,包括21(51.2%)男性和20名(48.8%)的女性。 VAS和ODI评分从术前从术后降低,但JOA和SF-36物理组件总结得分显着增加。 VAS(腰部)得分从5.05±2.33降至0.45±0.71(P = 0.000); VAS(腿)得分从5.51±2.82降至0.53±0.72(P = 0.000); ODI评分从52.80±20.41降至4.84±3.98(p = 0.000),JOA得分从11.73±4.99增加到25.32±2.12(p = 0.000)。只有1名患者经历了术中并发症(2.4%;多云撕裂),1例患者需要重新进食(2.4%)。结论:LSS的外科治疗是充分减压并最大限度地减少手术引起的创伤和并发症。本研究没有透露PED的任何明显的缺点,并建议PED是对LSS的安全有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号