首页> 外文期刊>Earth System Science Data >Complementing regional moment magnitudes to GCMT: a perspective from the rebuilt International Seismological Centre Bulletin
【24h】

Complementing regional moment magnitudes to GCMT: a perspective from the rebuilt International Seismological Centre Bulletin

机译:与GCMT的区域时刻大幅度补充:重建国际地震中心公报的视角

获取原文
           

摘要

Seismologists and geoscientists often need earthquake catalogues for various types of research. This input usually contains basic earthquake parameters such as location (longitude, latitude, depth, and origin time), as well as magnitude information. For the latter, the moment magnitude M w has become the most sought after magnitude scale in the seismological community to characterize the size of an earthquake. In this contribution we provide an informative account of the M w content for the newly rebuilt Bulletin of the International Seismological Centre (ISC, http://www.isc.ac.uk , last access: May?2021), which is regarded as the most comprehensive record of the Earth's seismicity. From this data, we extracted a list of hypocentres with M w from a multitude of agencies reporting data to the ISC. We first summarize the main temporal and spatial features of the M w provided by global (i.e. providing results for moderate to great earthquakes worldwide) and regional agencies (i.e. also providing results for small earthquakes in a specific area). Following this, we discuss their comparisons, by considering not only M w but also the surface wave magnitude M S and short-period body wave magnitude m b . By using the Global Centroid Moment Tensor solutions as an authoritative global agency, we identify regional agencies that best complement it and show examples of frequency–magnitude distributions in different areas obtained both from the Global Centroid Moment Tensor alone and complemented by M w from regional agencies. The work done by the regional agencies in terms of M w is fundamental to improve our understanding of the seismicity of an area, and we call for the implementation of procedures to compute M w in a systematic way in areas currently not well covered in this respect, such as vast parts of continental Asia and Africa. In addition, more studies are needed to clarify the causes of the apparent overestimation of global M w estimations compared to regional M w . Such difference is also observed in the comparisons of M w with M S and m b . The results presented here are obtained from the dataset ( Di?Giacomo and Harris ,? 2020 ,? https://doi.org/10.31905/J2W2M64S ) stored at the ISC Dataset Repository ( http://www.isc.ac.uk/dataset_repository/ , last access: May?2021).
机译:地震论家和地球科学家经常需要各种类型的研究地震目录。该输入通常包含基本地震参数,例如位置(经度,纬度,深度和原始时间),以及幅度信息。对于后者,矩大小M W已成为地震群体中最大的幅度尺度,以表征地震的大小。在这一贡献中,我们为国际地震中心的新重建公告(ISC,http://www.isc.ac.uk,上次访问)提供了内容的内容的内容,这是被视为地球地震性最全面的记录。从此数据中,我们从将数据报告数据报告到ISC的众多代理商中提取了一个Hypocentres列表。我们首先总结了由全球范围内提供的M W的主要时间和空间特征(即,为全球中学到大地震提供结果)和区域机构(即也为特定领域的小地震提供结果)。在此之后,我们通过考虑不仅考虑M W而且是表面波幅度M S和短周期体波幅度M b来讨论它们的比较。通过使用全球中心矩张解人作为权威的全球机构,我们确定最佳补充的区域机构,并显示从全球质心矩张统计学家获得的不同领域的频率幅度分布的示例,并由区域机构互相补充。区域机构在M W方面所做的工作是改善我们对某个地区地震性的理解的基础,我们要求实施程序,以便在目前在这方面的系统中以系统的方式计算M W. ,如大陆亚洲和非洲的大部分。此外,与区域M W相比,需要更多的研究来阐明全球M W估计明显高估的原因。在M W和M B的比较中也观察到这种差异。这里提出的结果是从数据集(di?giacoco和harris,?2020,?https://doi.org/10.31905/j2w2m64s)从DataSet(di?giacoco和harris,https://doi.org/10.31905/j2w2m64s)从ISC DataSet Repository(http://www.isc.ac.uk中/ dataset_repository /,last访问:5月份?2021)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号