...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Rheumatology >Rheumatoid artrhitis treatment in Brazil: data from a large real-life multicenter study
【24h】

Rheumatoid artrhitis treatment in Brazil: data from a large real-life multicenter study

机译:巴西类风湿性关节炎治疗:来自大型现实生活的数据

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Last decades witnessed great technological advances in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management, but their implementation in clinical practice might prove difficult. Despite the efficacy demonstrated in controlled trials this information needs to be confirmed by real life data. This study assessed real-life treatment among RA patients. REAL study included Brazilian RA patients from eleven centers. Interview and medical records were performed. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t or Mann-Whitney and categorical variables were assessed with chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. 1115 patients were included, women 89.5%. Median age 56.6?years, disease duration 152.5?months; 78.7% were rheumatoid fator positive; 55.2% had erosive disease; DAS28 (disease activity index-28 joints)?=?3.5, HAQ (health assessment questionnaire) =0.875. The median duration of symptoms until the start of first DMARD was 12?months. A total of 529 (47.2%) patients used corticosteroids; 1022 (90.8%) were on conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs and 406 (36.1%) on biological (b) DMARDs. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequent csDMARD: 748 (66.5%) patients, followed by leflunomide (LFN), used by 381 (33.9%) of patients. MTX was associated to LFN in 142 (12.6%) patients. Only five (0.4%) patients used triple therapy (MTX?+?hydroxychloroquine + sulfasalazine) or sulfasalazine in monotherapy. Despite advances in therapeutic resources, roughly half RA patients failed achieve T2T goals and 55.2% developed erosive disease. The frequent use of corticosteroids and delay in initiating DMARDs were demonstrated. Issues concerning timely access to medical care are crucial for effective management.
机译:上几十年目睹了类风湿性关节炎(RA)管理的巨大技术进展,但他们在临床实践中的实施可能证明困难。尽管受控试验中表现出的功效,但这些信息需要通过现实生活数据确认。本研究评估了RA患者的真实治疗。实际研究包括来自11个中心的巴西RA患者。进行采访和医疗记录。使用学生的T或Mann-Whitney和分类变量进行比较连续变量,并用Chi-Square或Fisher的确切测试评估。 1115名患者包括89.5%。中位年龄56.6?年龄,疾病期限152.5?月份; 78.7%是类风湿粉丝阳性; 55.2%的腐蚀性疾病; DAS28(疾病活动指数-28关节)?=?3.5,HAQ(健康评估问卷)= 0.875。直到第一个DMARD开始的症状的中位数持续时间为12个月。共529名(47.2%)患者使用皮质类固醇; 1022(90.8%)在常规合成(CS)DMARD和406(36.1%)上生物(B)DMARD。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是最常见的CSDMARD:748(66.5%)患者,其次是Leflunomide(LFN),由381(33.9%)患者使用。 MTX与142名(12.6%)患者的LFN相关联。只有五(0.4%)患者使用三重治疗(MTX?+?羟基甲基喹啉+磺基碱)或单药治疗中的亚磺碱。尽管治疗资源进展,但大约一半的RA患者未能实现T2T目标,55.2%发达的腐蚀性疾病。证明了频繁使用皮质类固醇和启动DMARD的延迟。关于及时获得医疗保健的问题对于有效管理至关重要。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号