首页> 外文期刊>Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering >Effectiveness of Erosion Control Structures in Reducing Soil Loss on Skid Trails
【24h】

Effectiveness of Erosion Control Structures in Reducing Soil Loss on Skid Trails

机译:侵蚀控制结构在降低防滑道土壤损失时的有效性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Forest operations can lead to increased runoff and soil loss on roads and skid trails. Best management practices (BMPs) aim to minimize erosion and water quality problems, but the efficacies of various BMP options such as water bars are not well documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different densities of water diversion structures (water bars) on runoff volume and soil loss on different skid trail gradients on two soils with different textures in the Shenrood forest, Guilan province, northern Iran. The treatments included combinations of four densities of water bars (1, 2, 3 or 6 water bars per 150 m length of skid trail section [overland trail]), on two levels of trail gradient (≤20% and >20%) and two soil textures (clay loam and silt loam). Average runoff volume and soil loss per m2 of skid trail surface area were significantly greater (P≤0.05) on silt loam than on clay loam textured soils, and on slope gradients >20% (23–28%) than on gradients ≤20% (5–13%). Average runoff volume increased, and average soil loss decreased significantly (P≤0.05) with increasing density of water bars on both gradients and on both soil textures. On both soil textures, the lowest surface runoff volumes were observed with one water bar and the greatest volumes with six water bars installed. In contrast, the smallest amount of soil loss on both soil textures was observed with six water bars, and the greatest soil loss when only one water bar was installed. The installation of additional water bars led to significant differences in both responses at each level of density and led to reductions in soil loss of 77%, 57% and 27% in the clay loam, and 79%, 60% and 30% in the silt loam soil compared to the single water bar treatment. The reduced soil loss per unit of surface runoff volume is likely due to the reduced velocity of surface water runoff in the skid trail. The greater density of water bars appears to effectively divert more but slower flowing water from the skid trail, leading to reduced soil loss. While additional water bars thus better meet the objective of BMPs to minimize soil loss, managers need to balance the cost of the construction of additional water bars against the ecological benefits of reduced soil loss. An investment into additional water bars may be worthwhile if the additional structures are able to divert surface runoff more effectively to nearby vegetation and reduce the input of soil from skid trails to streams, thereby preventing the loss of water quality of these streams.
机译:森林运营可能导致道路和滑行路径上增加径流和土壤损失。最佳管理实践(BMPS)旨在最大限度地减少侵蚀和水质问题,但各种BMP选项如水棒的效果并不充分记录。本研究的目的是评估各种冲水结构(水箱)对两种土壤不同纹理不同纹理,桂兰省,伊朗神币森林不同纹理不同纹理径流梯度对径流量和土壤损失的影响。该处理包括单个水棒的组合(1,2,3或6个每150米的滑轨部分[陆迹迹]),两级径梯度(≤20%和> 20%)和两种土壤纹理(粘土壤土和淤泥壤土)。 SLID LOAM的平均径流量和土壤损失在淤泥壤土上显着更大(p≤0.05),而不是粘土壤土织地不妥示,坡度梯度> 20%(23-28%)比梯度≤20% (5-13%)。平均径流量增加,平均土壤损失显着降低(P≤0.05),梯度上的水棒密度和土壤纹理的密度增加。在两种土壤纹理上,用一个水吧和安装六个水杆的最大卷观察到最低表面径流量。相比之下,用六个水杆观察到两种土壤纹理上的最小土壤损失,并且只安装了一个水箱时,最大的土壤损失。额外的水棒的安装导致每个密度水平的反应的显着差异,并导致粘土壤土的土壤损失为77%,57%和27%的土壤损失,79%,60%和30%淤泥壤土土壤与单个水棒处理相比。每单位表面径流体积的土壤损失降低可能是由于滑轨中表面水径流的速度降低。较大的水棒密度似乎有效地转移了更多,但从滑雪道上的流动性较慢,导致土壤损失降低。虽然额外的水箱更好地满足了BMP的目标,以尽量减少土壤损失,但管理人员需要平衡额外的水箱建设成本,以防止土壤损失降低的生态效益。如果额外的结构能够更有效地转移到附近的植被并减少从滑行到溪流的滑轨的土壤输入,则投资将是值得的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号