首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Extraction-Free Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Comparison with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay across Two Medical Centers
【24h】

Extraction-Free Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Comparison with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay across Two Medical Centers

机译:通过逆转录PCR检测SARS-COV-2的无萃取方法 - 与两个医疗中心的Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2测定的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, testing has been complicated by supply shortages and long turnaround times. A major limiting factor early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was the lack of ready availabil- ity of the reagents for RNA extraction, which remains an expensive and time-consuming part of some testing modalities. Of great interest, extraction-free methods for use with both nasopharyngeal and saliva sources have been investigated in pilot studies (1–6). In this study, we assessed the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in two clinical laboratories from 144 nasopharyngeal specimens, utilizing an extraction-free method and RT-PCR using CDC pri- mers/probe (Fig. 1A). We compared this method (Direct N2) with the widely used Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay, which has FDA emergency use authorization (EUA).
机译:逆转录PCR(RT-PCR)是诊断严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-COV-2)感染的金标准; 但是,通过供应短缺和长期周转时间,测试已经复杂化。 2019年冠状病毒疾病早期的主要限制因素(Covid-19)大流行是RNA提取的试剂缺乏,这仍然是一些测试方式的昂贵且耗时的部分。 令人兴趣的是,在试验研究(1-6)中已经研究了与鼻咽和唾液源的萃取方法进行了调查。 在这项研究中,我们评估了在来自144个鼻咽标本的两种临床实验室中的SARS-COV-2检测,使用CDC PRI- MERS /探针使用萃取方法和RT-PCR(图1A)。 我们将这种方法(直接N2)与广泛使用的Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2测定进行了比较,其具有FDA紧急使用授权(EUA)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号