...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced transportation >Effect of Adaptive Cruise Control on Mixed Traffic Flow: A Comparison of Constant Time Gap Policy with Variable Time Gap Policy
【24h】

Effect of Adaptive Cruise Control on Mixed Traffic Flow: A Comparison of Constant Time Gap Policy with Variable Time Gap Policy

机译:自适应巡航控制对混合交通流量的影响:可变时间差距政策的恒定时间间隙政策的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

With the emerging application of low-level driving automation technology, heterogeneous traffic flow mixed with human-driven vehicles and low-level autonomous vehicles is dawning. In this context, it is imperative to investigate its effect on mixed traffic flow. As a key component for adaptive cruise control (ACC) which is a practical low-level application of driving automation, the time gap policy determines the dynamic of ACC-equipped vehicles and plays a crucial role in traffic flow stability and efficiency. There are two main time gap policies used for ACC at present, namely, constant time gap (CTG) policy and variable time gap (VTG) policy. In this study, we carried out a detailed comparison between these time gap policies to investigate their potential effect on mixed traffic flow, where the analytical- and simulation-based approaches are both considered. Analytical results show that VTG policy is superior to CTG policy in stabilizing the mixed traffic flow. In addition, numerical simulations are also conducted and simulation results further support the analytical results. As for throughput, there is no difference between CTG policy and VTG policy in analytical progress when the same time gap is set at the equilibrium. However, simulation results based on an on-ramp scenario show that the throughput of mixed traffic flow with VTG policy is slightly higher than that of CTG policy. Meanwhile, the scatter of mixed traffic flow with VTG policy in the flow-density diagram gradually clusters in the middle range of density (i.e., 20–40?veh/km) with the increase of the penetration rates of ACC vehicles, where the traffic flow operates more efficiently. These results indicate that VTG policy is better than CTG policy when designing controllers for ACC in the context of traffic flow operation and control.
机译:随着低水平驾驶自动化技术的新兴应用,与人类驱动的车辆和低级自治车辆混合的异质交通流量正在淘汰。在这种情况下,必须调查其对混合交通流量的影响。作为自适应巡航控制(ACC)的关键部件,它是驾驶自动化的实用低级应用,时间差距策略决定了装备的车辆的动态,并在交通流稳定性和效率中起着至关重要的作用。目前有两个主要时间差距策略,即恒定时间差(CTG)策略和可变时间间隙(VTG)策略。在这项研究中,我们在这些时间差距政策之间进行了详细的比较,以调查它们对混合交通流量的潜在影响,其中基于分析和模拟的方法都考虑。分析结果表明,VTG策略优于CTG策略稳定混合交通流量。此外,还进行了数值模拟,并且仿真结果进一步支持分析结果。至于吞吐量,CTG策略与VTG策略在分析进度中没有区别,当在平衡时设定相同的时间间隔。但是,基于斜坡方案的仿真结果表明,使用VTG策略的混合业务流量的吞吐量略高于CTG策略。同时,在流动密度图中与VTG策略的混合交通流量的散射逐渐簇在中间密度(即20-40?车辆/ km)随着ACC车辆的渗透率的增加而增加,交通流程更有效地运行。这些结果表明,当在流量流操作和控制的上下文中设计用于ACC的控制器时,VTG策略优于CTG策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号