首页> 外文期刊>Prostate International >Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy
【24h】

Open simple prostatectomy and robotic simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: Comparison of safety and efficacy

机译:对大型良性前列腺增生开放简单的前列腺切除术和机器人外切除术:安全性和疗效比较

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundTo compare the safety and efficacy of open simple prostatectomy (OSP) and robotic simple prostatectomy (RSP) for the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 52 patients who underwent OSP (n?=?23) and RSP (n?=?29) between January 2005 and March 2019 at a single institution. The preoperative status of the patients, complications related to surgery, and the functional outcomes of the surgery were analyzed.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the preoperative total prostate volume, transitional volume, prostate-specific antigen value, and age between the two groups. Postoperative improvements in the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual were significant and similar for both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding surgery duration and resected prostate volume. The majority of patients in both groups had the urethral Foley catheter removed within the planned 10?day postoperative period, with the exception of two patients in the OSP group who had prolonged indwelling Foley catheter placement because of persistent hematuria. Postoperative hematocrit changes were significantly lower in the RSP group (RSP: 7.8?±?4.1%, OSP: 14.2?±?4.9%,P?
机译:背景技术比较公开式前列腺切除术(OSP)和机器人简单前列腺切除术(RSP)治疗大型良性前列腺增生(BPH)的安全性和疗效。材料和方法回顾性地审查了52名接受OSP的患者的病历(n?= 23)和2019年1月至2019年3月间的RSP(N?= 29)。分析了患者的术前状态,与手术相关的并发症以及手术的功能结果进行了分析。术前术前前列腺体积,过渡体积,特异性抗原值和两组之间的年龄没有显着差异。术后改善国际前列腺症状评分,最大尿流率和后异形残留对两组的显着性和相似。两组关于手术持续时间和切除前列腺体积之间没有显着差异。两组患者的大多数患者都有尿道福利导管在计划的10?日术后,除了两个患者,由于持续的血尿,这两个患者延长了留置福利导管展示率。术后血细胞比容在RSP组中显着降低(RSP:7.8?±4.1%,OSP:14.2?±4.9%,P?<0.001)。由于显着的术中出血,七名患者(30.4%)接受了OSP和两名患者(6.9%)的患者(6.9%)。来自接受输血的RSP组的两名患者包括接受RSP治疗的前两种病例。在随访期间,两个患者(OSP组中的一名患者和RSP组中的一名患者)接受了膀胱颈挛缩的膀胱颈部的经过尿道切口。ConclusionBoth和RSP可以在手术后产生出色的结果。然而,RSP的出血并发症明显不太普遍,表明RSP可以取代传统的OSP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号