首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries
【24h】

Mortality and revision risk after femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation for undisplaced fracture with arthroplasty for displaced fracture: a population-based study from Danish National Registries

机译:股骨颈骨折后的死亡率和修正风险:对易移骨折关节置换术的未偏移骨折的内部固定的比较:丹麦国家注册表的基于人群的研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and purpose — Hemiarthroplasty has lower reoperation frequency and better mobilization compared with internal fixation (IF) in patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNF), which might translate into lower mortality. In this population-based cohort study we compare the risk of mortality and reoperation in undisplaced FNF treated with IF and displaced FNF treated with arthroplasty in patients older than 70 years old. We assume that, per se, there is no difference in mortality risk between patients with a displaced and an undisplaced FNF.
机译:背景和目的 - 与未透露的股骨颈骨折(FNF)患者的内部固定(IF)相比,半血管置换术与内固定(IF)相比,具有较低的再置频率和更好的动员,这可能转化为降低死亡率。 在该群体的群组中,我们比较未披露的FNF在未偏移的FNF治疗的患者治疗的患者均已达到70岁的患者的情况下对未偏移的FNF治疗的死亡率和重新进食的风险。 我们认为,本身,流离失所者和未铺展的FNF之间的死亡风险没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号