首页> 外文期刊>The journal of high energy physics >Large NLO corrections in t t ˉ W ± $$ toverline{t}{W}^{pm } $$ and t t ˉ t t ˉ $$ toverline{t}toverline{t} $$ hadroproduction from supposedly subleading EW contributions
【24h】

Large NLO corrections in t t ˉ W ± $$ toverline{t}{W}^{pm } $$ and t t ˉ t t ˉ $$ toverline{t}toverline{t} $$ hadroproduction from supposedly subleading EW contributions

机译:大NLO更正 <数学的xmlns:的xlink = “http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink”> <动机口音= “真”> <莫伸缩性= “真”>ˉ w ^ ± $$吨 {划线吨} {白} ^ {下午} $ $ <数学的xmlns:的xlink =“HTTP: //www.w3.org/1999/xlink “> <动机口音=” 真 “> <莫伸缩性=” 真“>ˉ <动机口音= “真”> <莫伸缩性= “真”>ˉ < / EquationSource> $$吨 {划线T】吨 {划线T】$$ 从假想subleading EW贡献hadroproduction

获取原文
       

摘要

A bstract We calculate the complete-NLO predictions for t t ˉ W ± $$ toverline{t}{W}^{pm } $$ and t t ˉ t t ˉ $$ toverline{t}toverline{t} $$ production in proton-proton collisions at 13 and 100 TeV. All the non-vanishing contributions of O α s i α j $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^i{lpha}^jight) $$ with i + j = 3 , 4 for t t ˉ W ± $$ toverline{t}{W}^{pm } $$ and i + j = 4 , 5 for t t ˉ t t ˉ $$ toverline{t}toverline{t} $$ are evaluated without any approximation. For t t ˉ W ± $$ toverline{t}{W}^{pm } $$ we find that, due to the presence of tW → tW scattering, at 13(100) TeV the O α s α 3 $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s{lpha}^3ight) $$ contribution is about 12(70)% of the LO, i.e., it is larger than the so-called NLO EW corrections (the O α s 2 α 2 $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^2{lpha}^2ight) $$ terms) and has opposite sign. In the case of t t ˉ t t ˉ $$ toverline{t}toverline{t} $$ production, large contributions from electroweak tt → tt scattering are already present at LO in the O α s 3 α $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^3lpha ight) $$ and O α s 2 α 2 $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^2{lpha}^2ight) $$ terms. For the same reason we find that both NLO terms of O α s 4 α $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^4lpha ight) $$ , i.e., the NLO EW corrections, and O α s 3 α 2 $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^3{lpha}^2ight) $$ are large (±15% of the LO) and their relative contributions strongly depend on the values of the renormalisation and factorisation scales. However, large accidental cancellations are present (away from the threshold region) between these two contributions. Moreover, the NLO corrections strongly depend on the kinematics and are particularly large at the threshold, where even the relative contribution from O α s 2 α 3 $$ mathcal{O}left({lpha}_s^2{lpha}^3ight) $$ terms amounts to tens of percents.
机译:一个bstract我们计算TTˉ与W±$$牛逼划线横置完整,非线性光学预测【W】^ {}下午$$和TT TTˉˉ$$牛逼划线横置牛逼划线【T } $$生产质子 - 质子碰撞在13和100 TeV的。所有非零öαSIαJ $$ mathcal {Ó}的贡献左({阿尔法} _s ^ I {阿尔法} ^Ĵ右)$$其中i +为TT J = 3,4 ˉ与W±$$吨 {划线吨} {白} ^ {下午} $$和i +为TT TTˉˉ$$吨 {划线T】吨 {划线T】J = 4,5 $$没有任何近似进行了评价。对于TTˉ与W±$$吨 {划线吨} {白} ^ {下午} $$我们发现,由于TW TW→散射的存在下,在13(100)的TeV将OαSα3 $ $ mathcal {ö} 左({阿尔法} _s {阿尔法} ^ 3 右)$$贡献是关于LO的12(70)%,即,它比所谓的NLO EW校正较大(将Oα第2α2 $$ mathcal {ö} 左({阿尔法} _s ^ 2 {阿尔法} ^ 2 右)$$而言)和具有相反的符号。在TT TTˉˉ$$吨 {划线T】吨 {划线T】$$生产,大的贡献从弱电TT→TT散射是在已经存在于LO将OαS 3α$$ mathcal的情况下{ø} 左({阿尔法} _s ^ 3 阿尔法右)$$和OαS 2α2 $$ mathcal {ö} 左({阿尔法} _s ^ 2 {阿尔法} ^ 2 右)$$条款。出于同样的原因,我们发现的O-α第4α$$ mathcal {ö} 左({阿尔法} _s ^ 4 阿尔法右)$$,即,NLO EW校正,和O都NLO术语α第3α2 $$ mathcal {ö} 左({阿尔法} _s ^ 3 {阿尔法} ^ 2 右)$$被大和它们的相对贡献(LO的±15%)强烈依赖于在重整化和因式分解尺度的值。然而,大的意外取消存在这两个贡献之间(远离阈值区域)。此外,NLO校正强烈地依赖于运动学和特别大于该阈值,其中甚至选自OαS 2α3 $$ mathcal {Ó}的相对贡献左({阿尔法} _s ^ 2 {阿尔法} ^ 3 右)$$方面达数十百分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利